Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Xavian Starsider" data-source="post: 7749362" data-attributes="member: 6790169">I like the idea of the Spectacular Settlements book but have to admit the stretch goals are giving me trepidation about the final quality.  For two reasons.First if the stretch goals are all met, we are looking at eight examples of each of the eight settlement types.  Stretch goals are adding more to the ones planned. Should they? Are we just now adding the ones they were cut for not being as good/interesting as the others?  Are we putting the rejects back in? Or worse yet,  banging out more just to meet the quota?Secondly, 24 of these 64 settlements are going to be designed by high end backers? Should I feel good that nearly half the examples in the book come from any random Joe with a few Benjamins to burn while the rejects round out the rest?Quantity is not always the best thing to offer. There IS a point of diminishing returns.  Don't cross it. Your examples chapter will only be as good as its worst examples.Personally I think the book should offer just three really good examples of each of the eight settlement types while the rest (including the ones made by backers) get  shoved into a supplemental pdf expansion.But I have no experience with this company. Am I being too harsh?</blockquote>