Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
RPG Evolution: Guilty?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="talien" data-source="post: 9124153" data-attributes="member: 3285"><p>Before a criminal's guilt can be determined, your fantasy society has to care about justice first.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]294669[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center"><a href="https://pixabay.com/illustrations/justice-statue-fog-clouds-sky-5947790/" target="_blank">Picture courtesy of Pixabay.</a></p><h3>Hue-and-Cry</h3><p>Early policing and justice systems relied on <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hue_and_cry" target="_blank">the hue-and-cry</a>, a process by which bystanders are summoned to assist in the apprehension of a criminal who has been witnessed in the act of committing a crime. There are some obvious issues with this method, most specifically that if there are no witnesses a hue-and-cry cannot be raised, and much of the testimony against the criminal relies on the reputation of those raising the hue-and-cry in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Assuming the accused was apprehended, early medieval societies used a blend of trial by ideal and compurgation to determine their innocence. Both were vulnerable to abuse and manipulation by outside forces. Trial by ideal was usually used when a crime was accused on the basis of specific facts, while compurgation was used when an accusation was precipitated by public outcry.</p><h3>Trial by Ordeal</h3><p>Early medieval societies used <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_by_ordeal" target="_blank">trial by ordeal</a>, a religious practice in which guilt or innocence is determined by a painful and usually dangerous experience. This could be by combat, taking place between the two parties in dispute. Sometimes, champions were designated to fight on their behalf. Whoever lost was considered liable or guilty.</p><p></p><p>Trial by fire, a form of torture, required the accused to walk nine feet over red-hot plowshares or holding a burning iron. The wound would then be bandaged and re-examined three days later. If the wound was festering, the accused was guilty.</p><p></p><p>Trial by water required the accused to reach into a boiling pot of water to retrieve a stone, with the depth of the boiling water determined by the severity of the crime. Like the trial by fire, the nature of the wound would determine the accused's innocence or guilt. There was also dunking in cold water, often against supposed witches, in which the guilty was dunked in water and, if they sank, were considered innocent.</p><p></p><p>If the victim was dead, there was even <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruentation" target="_blank">cruentation</a>, in which the accused would be required to put their hands on the dead body and, if it bled or moved, was considered evidence of guilt.</p><p></p><p>There are flaws in this system, the most obvious being that innocence is being determined by a divine force. Depending on the campaign, this might rely on the character's relationship with his patron deity, or it might be circumventable by magic.</p><p></p><p>For player characters, ordeals pose an interesting opportunity. In combat, most PCs have resources at their disposal that common villagers might not (although a champion appointed by a powerful noble could pose a challenge). Trials by fire and water can both be circumvented with spells; the assumption is that divine punishment determines guilt, so it's up to the DM to determine if this has any basis. A cleric attempting to heal someone who is guilty might find their spells don't work.</p><h3>Compurgation</h3><p>Compurgation, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compurgation" target="_blank">also known as trial by oath</a>, was a defense an accused could use to take an oath of innocence along with 12 of their friends and allies. The idea being that a person of good character wouldn't lie about committing a crime. It was not, notably, about whether or not the 12 knew if the person was guilty.</p><p></p><p>Compurgation was sometimes used by influential people to get around trials by ordeal. It was also a means of ensuring those of higher influence could easily avoid criminal charges, by relying on their reputation. The dispossessed, mentally ill, and underclass might not be able to muster the resources available to someone of higher rank. Additionally, compurgation made it possible to accuse someone of being a changeling or a witch; those who couldn't defend themselves would be susceptible to trial by ordeal instead.</p><p></p><p>Compurgation is trickier for PCs to circumvent, but with the right application of charm spells it can be overcome. Conversely, doppelgangers and shapeshifters can wreak havoc with compurgation, as a person's reputation trades on consistency and the accused could theoretically kill with impunity with enough allies willing to attest to their innocence. Unpleasant and unpopular PCs might find themselves surprisingly vulnerable to compurgation.</p><h3>Just the Facts, Ma'am</h3><p>Early societies didn't rely on facts so much as divine intervention (trial by ordeal), personal skill (trial by combat), and a good reputation (compurgation). PCs who decide to break the law might be surprised to learn that facts matter less than their relationship with their deity and their neighbors.</p><p></p><p><strong>Your Turn: What sort of justice systems do you apply to your fantasy societies?</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="talien, post: 9124153, member: 3285"] Before a criminal's guilt can be determined, your fantasy society has to care about justice first. [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="justice-5947790_1280.jpg"]294669[/ATTACH] [URL='https://pixabay.com/illustrations/justice-statue-fog-clouds-sky-5947790/']Picture courtesy of Pixabay.[/URL][/CENTER] [HEADING=2]Hue-and-Cry[/HEADING] Early policing and justice systems relied on [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hue_and_cry']the hue-and-cry[/URL], a process by which bystanders are summoned to assist in the apprehension of a criminal who has been witnessed in the act of committing a crime. There are some obvious issues with this method, most specifically that if there are no witnesses a hue-and-cry cannot be raised, and much of the testimony against the criminal relies on the reputation of those raising the hue-and-cry in the first place. Assuming the accused was apprehended, early medieval societies used a blend of trial by ideal and compurgation to determine their innocence. Both were vulnerable to abuse and manipulation by outside forces. Trial by ideal was usually used when a crime was accused on the basis of specific facts, while compurgation was used when an accusation was precipitated by public outcry. [HEADING=2]Trial by Ordeal[/HEADING] Early medieval societies used [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_by_ordeal']trial by ordeal[/URL], a religious practice in which guilt or innocence is determined by a painful and usually dangerous experience. This could be by combat, taking place between the two parties in dispute. Sometimes, champions were designated to fight on their behalf. Whoever lost was considered liable or guilty. Trial by fire, a form of torture, required the accused to walk nine feet over red-hot plowshares or holding a burning iron. The wound would then be bandaged and re-examined three days later. If the wound was festering, the accused was guilty. Trial by water required the accused to reach into a boiling pot of water to retrieve a stone, with the depth of the boiling water determined by the severity of the crime. Like the trial by fire, the nature of the wound would determine the accused's innocence or guilt. There was also dunking in cold water, often against supposed witches, in which the guilty was dunked in water and, if they sank, were considered innocent. If the victim was dead, there was even [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruentation']cruentation[/URL], in which the accused would be required to put their hands on the dead body and, if it bled or moved, was considered evidence of guilt. There are flaws in this system, the most obvious being that innocence is being determined by a divine force. Depending on the campaign, this might rely on the character's relationship with his patron deity, or it might be circumventable by magic. For player characters, ordeals pose an interesting opportunity. In combat, most PCs have resources at their disposal that common villagers might not (although a champion appointed by a powerful noble could pose a challenge). Trials by fire and water can both be circumvented with spells; the assumption is that divine punishment determines guilt, so it's up to the DM to determine if this has any basis. A cleric attempting to heal someone who is guilty might find their spells don't work. [HEADING=2]Compurgation[/HEADING] Compurgation, [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compurgation']also known as trial by oath[/URL], was a defense an accused could use to take an oath of innocence along with 12 of their friends and allies. The idea being that a person of good character wouldn't lie about committing a crime. It was not, notably, about whether or not the 12 knew if the person was guilty. Compurgation was sometimes used by influential people to get around trials by ordeal. It was also a means of ensuring those of higher influence could easily avoid criminal charges, by relying on their reputation. The dispossessed, mentally ill, and underclass might not be able to muster the resources available to someone of higher rank. Additionally, compurgation made it possible to accuse someone of being a changeling or a witch; those who couldn't defend themselves would be susceptible to trial by ordeal instead. Compurgation is trickier for PCs to circumvent, but with the right application of charm spells it can be overcome. Conversely, doppelgangers and shapeshifters can wreak havoc with compurgation, as a person's reputation trades on consistency and the accused could theoretically kill with impunity with enough allies willing to attest to their innocence. Unpleasant and unpopular PCs might find themselves surprisingly vulnerable to compurgation. [HEADING=2]Just the Facts, Ma'am[/HEADING] Early societies didn't rely on facts so much as divine intervention (trial by ordeal), personal skill (trial by combat), and a good reputation (compurgation). PCs who decide to break the law might be surprised to learn that facts matter less than their relationship with their deity and their neighbors. [B]Your Turn: What sort of justice systems do you apply to your fantasy societies?[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
RPG Evolution: Guilty?
Top