Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gamerprinter" data-source="post: 7680919" data-attributes="member: 50895"><p>Interesting article. Unlike most, being one of those older gamers (having played D&amp;D since 1977), I have little nostalgia for Old School. While I was happy with each edition as each existed, they were good at the time, but with the advance of editions and the creation of new mechanics, more player options I have been content with the new direction taken, without a desire to go back to the way things used to be. I didn't become a content creator, author, publisher until the advent of Pathfinder RPG, and have embraced using PF to base all my design and setting development. Not only do I not need to look backward, I am just as content at not looking at 5e - it in no way attracts me away from Pathfinder. So while I wish success for every RPG publishing venture, including 5e, I do not need to be part of every edition nor every game. For the time being I will remain a creator of PF based design.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="gamerprinter, post: 7680919, member: 50895"] Interesting article. Unlike most, being one of those older gamers (having played D&D since 1977), I have little nostalgia for Old School. While I was happy with each edition as each existed, they were good at the time, but with the advance of editions and the creation of new mechanics, more player options I have been content with the new direction taken, without a desire to go back to the way things used to be. I didn't become a content creator, author, publisher until the advent of Pathfinder RPG, and have embraced using PF to base all my design and setting development. Not only do I not need to look backward, I am just as content at not looking at 5e - it in no way attracts me away from Pathfinder. So while I wish success for every RPG publishing venture, including 5e, I do not need to be part of every edition nor every game. For the time being I will remain a creator of PF based design. [/QUOTE]

Verification