Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Thomas Shey" data-source="post: 9314811" data-attributes="member: 7026617">I wasn't talking in regard to the law.&nbsp; Laws can make dumb things or sensible thing that have nothing to do with the ethics of the situation.&nbsp; Current law isn't caught up with how to handle AI in all kinds of areas; the fact some people approve how it'll work in some places doesn't actually change that.I'll listen to other ones, but that one gets waved around a rather lot.I'd be willing to put a side bet that you could pay the non-public sources for a copy of each of their works per each training process, and there'd still be strong pushback, because you see all too much of the objections having only a little to do with the scraping.Again, nobody asks how legal the copies of various music or art human artists use when teaching themselves to do their art, whether they end up selling their work or not.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Thomas Shey, post: 9314811, member: 7026617"] I wasn't talking in regard to the law. Laws can make dumb things or sensible thing that have nothing to do with the ethics of the situation. Current law isn't caught up with how to handle AI in all kinds of areas; the fact some people approve how it'll work in some places doesn't actually change that. I'll listen to other ones, but that one gets waved around a rather lot. I'd be willing to put a side bet that you could pay the non-public sources for a copy of each of their works per each training process, and there'd still be strong pushback, because you see all too much of the objections having only a little to do with the scraping. Again, nobody asks how legal the copies of various music or art human artists use when teaching themselves to do their art, whether they end up selling their work or not. [/QUOTE]

Verification