Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="talien" data-source="post: 9467351" data-attributes="member: 3285">Thank you for this additional context! Tasini is still relevant (the National Geographic case pivots on it, with the appellate courts bouncing it back and forth because of Tasini) but to your point the Nat Geo case is even more significant in the context of a CD-ROM collection. Given TSR/WOTC's timeline and the appellate courts reversing decisions back and forth, you can see how this could easily confuse even a legal team. I've updated accordingly and referenced your post for credit. My overall point is how this is a blueprint for future battles between creatives, work for hire, and digital rights in the context of AI. In Monday's follow-up article I try to put all this legal wrangling in context how creatives might react to WOTC/Hasbro's use of their work to train AI.</blockquote>