Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
RPG Evolution: The Trouble with Halflings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 8697050" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>And, hey, I frequently see lots of posts on Reddit about playing all sorts of other races. Guess what, confirmation bias works both ways. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p>But, again, you're not quite reading what I'm writing. I never said that there was no support. Nor did I say that no one plays halflings. both statements are easily disproven. What I DID say was that so few people play halflings that they could be removed and it would make virtually no difference to the broader hobby because the broader hobby doesn't play halflings. But, because halflings are in the Core and especially in the SRD, every single supplement has to include a bone or two for halfling players because those are supposed to be one of the most commonly played races -that's why they are the Core 4 SRD races. </p><p></p><p>But they aren't. </p><p></p><p>Which is why I'm saying that it's time (and frankly long past time) that the PHB actually reflects what is being played. Which means opening up the PHB to some new ideas and see if they might gain a bit more traction with players in the same way that Tieflings and Dragonborn have. Which might mean that a couple of iterations down the line, the PHB line up of player races might be entirely different than it is now, or it might be very similar to what it is now, or it might be somewhere in between.</p><p></p><p>But, staying the course just makes the PHB less and less relevant as time goes on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 8697050, member: 22779"] And, hey, I frequently see lots of posts on Reddit about playing all sorts of other races. Guess what, confirmation bias works both ways. :D But, again, you're not quite reading what I'm writing. I never said that there was no support. Nor did I say that no one plays halflings. both statements are easily disproven. What I DID say was that so few people play halflings that they could be removed and it would make virtually no difference to the broader hobby because the broader hobby doesn't play halflings. But, because halflings are in the Core and especially in the SRD, every single supplement has to include a bone or two for halfling players because those are supposed to be one of the most commonly played races -that's why they are the Core 4 SRD races. But they aren't. Which is why I'm saying that it's time (and frankly long past time) that the PHB actually reflects what is being played. Which means opening up the PHB to some new ideas and see if they might gain a bit more traction with players in the same way that Tieflings and Dragonborn have. Which might mean that a couple of iterations down the line, the PHB line up of player races might be entirely different than it is now, or it might be very similar to what it is now, or it might be somewhere in between. But, staying the course just makes the PHB less and less relevant as time goes on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
RPG Evolution: The Trouble with Halflings
Top