Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 8824834" data-attributes="member: 29398">I can understand it, when trying to square the above with the below:Why don't these two quotes square with each other?Simple.&nbsp; Because even if the flawed design is WotC's doing, they're not going to fix it until we all fix it ourselves individually first, and in the process quite literally show them both a) what needs doing and b) how it's done.&nbsp; Therefore, advocating for them to proactively fix it - which you seem to be doing in the second quoted piece just above - is just an exercise in shouting at the wind.As for &quot;voiding the warranty&quot;, as a charter member of the Kitbashers Union(TM) it should go without saying that I have no problem with this whatsoever. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 8824834, member: 29398"] I can understand it, when trying to square the above with the below: Why don't these two quotes square with each other? Simple. Because even if the flawed design is WotC's doing, [I]they're not going to fix it[/I] until we all fix it ourselves individually first, and in the process quite literally show them both a) what needs doing and b) how it's done. Therefore, advocating for them to proactively fix it - which you seem to be doing in the second quoted piece just above - is just an exercise in shouting at the wind. As for "voiding the warranty", as a charter member of the Kitbashers Union[SIZE=2](TM)[/SIZE] it should go without saying that I have no problem with this whatsoever. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification