Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Coreyartus" data-source="post: 1076027" data-attributes="member: 5399">A couple months ago, in numerous emails to WotC and posts on the Wizards boards, those that expressed an interest in a Living Modern campaign were told that RPGA wasn't going to be starting any more campaigns because they didn't have the time.  We were told that even those of us who were actually willing to start a member-run Living Campaign would find that RPGA had no interest in supporting anymore campaigns. The resources were too thin, and that's why they were dropping Living Jungle, Virtual Seattle, and Living Rokugan.And now they're doing exactly the opposite of what they said.  Apparently the three dropped campaigns are continuing in some fashion, but if it is simply a shift from full RPGA support to member-enabled status, I find it curious that we were told they were going to be too busy for d20 Modern to create something similar.  Yet, Dragonlance and Sovereign Stone will be exactly that.The member-enabled campaigns center around products not managed by WotC.  The companies support the campaigns.  I understand there is a very limited number of d20 Modern camapaign settings out there, and the biggest one, Urban Arcana, is a WotC product, making any Living Campaign using that setting a fully-RPGA-supported-campaign by default.But gimme a break.  Don't tell us one thing, and then turn around and do something else.  We were told that even if we could get a company to support a campaign with their setting, it wasn't going to happen.I'm just kinda boggled.Coreyartus</blockquote>

Verification