Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
RPGing and imagination: a fundamental point
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 9201018" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Well, I agree, TSR was certainly well aware that B2 was perfectly playable with 1e or even 2e despite technically being a pre-Molvay Basic product (it doesn't hurt that the 1e MM itself seems to be written to conform to original D&D rules, not AD&D). Certainly we played B/X modules and such in our AD&D play without actually bothering to 'convert' anything, as about the worst you'd run into would be AC off by one and really who cares about 1 point? Maybe a few monsters have slightly different hit dice or something here or there, but most of the ones that appear in both systems have the same stats (again, modulus a point of AC maybe). </p><p></p><p>I think the to-hit numbers are pretty close as well in most cases, though you probably looked those up anyway, and if you were playing 2e and using THAC0 you'd have had to do that anyhow before play (you could use the 1e charts since they yield the same numbers for all but a few fairly obvious cases). </p><p></p><p>But yeah, it held back the system a lot in some ways. I still don't however get why 2e couldn't have had a better skill system. Its not like MOST of 1e officially had much anyway. I get the feeling TSR hoped that OA and WSD/DSG could continue to be sold as '2e books' effectively since they had a massive supply of them left over.</p><p></p><p>However: The beefing on 4e as breaking compatibility rings VERY false, because 3e is JUST AS MUCH incompatible with 2e as 4e is with 3e! Every bit! Like NOTHING from 2e works at all with 3e. You can argue that the same classes exist in 3e, and the same races (modulus a couple of things), but then you'd have to also admit that the same is true of 4e. If you can convert your level 12 half-orc ranger from 2e to 3e, then you can surely convert him to 4e as well! Both conversions will result in a somewhat different character, though exactly HOW different may depend on the degree of tinkering and reflavoring you're willing to do.</p><p></p><p>So honestly, the whole "4e breaks D&D!!!!!!!!" gnashing of teeth gets not even a drop of sympathy from me. Its just not going to fly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 9201018, member: 82106"] Well, I agree, TSR was certainly well aware that B2 was perfectly playable with 1e or even 2e despite technically being a pre-Molvay Basic product (it doesn't hurt that the 1e MM itself seems to be written to conform to original D&D rules, not AD&D). Certainly we played B/X modules and such in our AD&D play without actually bothering to 'convert' anything, as about the worst you'd run into would be AC off by one and really who cares about 1 point? Maybe a few monsters have slightly different hit dice or something here or there, but most of the ones that appear in both systems have the same stats (again, modulus a point of AC maybe). I think the to-hit numbers are pretty close as well in most cases, though you probably looked those up anyway, and if you were playing 2e and using THAC0 you'd have had to do that anyhow before play (you could use the 1e charts since they yield the same numbers for all but a few fairly obvious cases). But yeah, it held back the system a lot in some ways. I still don't however get why 2e couldn't have had a better skill system. Its not like MOST of 1e officially had much anyway. I get the feeling TSR hoped that OA and WSD/DSG could continue to be sold as '2e books' effectively since they had a massive supply of them left over. However: The beefing on 4e as breaking compatibility rings VERY false, because 3e is JUST AS MUCH incompatible with 2e as 4e is with 3e! Every bit! Like NOTHING from 2e works at all with 3e. You can argue that the same classes exist in 3e, and the same races (modulus a couple of things), but then you'd have to also admit that the same is true of 4e. If you can convert your level 12 half-orc ranger from 2e to 3e, then you can surely convert him to 4e as well! Both conversions will result in a somewhat different character, though exactly HOW different may depend on the degree of tinkering and reflavoring you're willing to do. So honestly, the whole "4e breaks D&D!!!!!!!!" gnashing of teeth gets not even a drop of sympathy from me. Its just not going to fly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
RPGing and imagination: a fundamental point
Top