Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
RPGNow EDGE Opens!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve Conan Trustrum" data-source="post: 2649617" data-attributes="member: 1620"><p>Keep in mind that a retailer/vendor almost never hears why someone leaves after one sale, one month or three years. In cases like this where someone makes sure that the retailer/vendor knows, a company would look at it and say "wow, three years and now they're going? What did we do wrong?" and get to the part where the site's color is mentioned and then realize that there's not much room to reason with that. A customer who is as flightly to give up three years of enjoying offered product for something like that isn't one that is going to offer much in the way of practical advice for decisions that affect the entire business. Say James changes the background to a color Vascant liked and then another customer comes and says the same thing and insists it should be white, what then?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not really. See, for that to be true there would have to be certain degree of logic tying the cause to the result. Giving up three years as a customer because of a disagreement over a color (considering the search problem has been addressed by James) isn't something a product provider should even really consider addressing unless you've a lot of people making the same statement (which won't happen.) The leap between the two is way beyond rational in the scope of an overall business even if it seems entirely valid to that one customer. Therein is the difference: what makes sense for one person is quite often absolutely worthless when considering one's overall market. That's why market research doesn't consist of sitting down with just one person and then going with what they tell you.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's safe to say you won't find a significant amount of ANY customers complainging about a storefront's colors enough to quit using it altogether, especially in this case.</p><p></p><p>As a pure hypothetical, yeah, James or anyone else would be wise to make such a change. As a practical question, yeah, there's a chance a lot of people may not like the site's colors. Will it ever happen to the degree in your hypothetical? Absolutely not, which is a big part of my point: your typical consumer doesn't care enough about it for them to say "you lost a customer because of your color choice." And why is that? Because a typical customer understands that the color on a site's background has no influence on the vendor's service or their ability to enjoy the product. When someone shows me how the color at RPGnow affects how I enjoy any quality product I buy there once I've paid for it and downloaded it, I'll take back my comment about it being an irrational influence on such a decision.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve Conan Trustrum, post: 2649617, member: 1620"] Keep in mind that a retailer/vendor almost never hears why someone leaves after one sale, one month or three years. In cases like this where someone makes sure that the retailer/vendor knows, a company would look at it and say "wow, three years and now they're going? What did we do wrong?" and get to the part where the site's color is mentioned and then realize that there's not much room to reason with that. A customer who is as flightly to give up three years of enjoying offered product for something like that isn't one that is going to offer much in the way of practical advice for decisions that affect the entire business. Say James changes the background to a color Vascant liked and then another customer comes and says the same thing and insists it should be white, what then? Not really. See, for that to be true there would have to be certain degree of logic tying the cause to the result. Giving up three years as a customer because of a disagreement over a color (considering the search problem has been addressed by James) isn't something a product provider should even really consider addressing unless you've a lot of people making the same statement (which won't happen.) The leap between the two is way beyond rational in the scope of an overall business even if it seems entirely valid to that one customer. Therein is the difference: what makes sense for one person is quite often absolutely worthless when considering one's overall market. That's why market research doesn't consist of sitting down with just one person and then going with what they tell you. It's safe to say you won't find a significant amount of ANY customers complainging about a storefront's colors enough to quit using it altogether, especially in this case. As a pure hypothetical, yeah, James or anyone else would be wise to make such a change. As a practical question, yeah, there's a chance a lot of people may not like the site's colors. Will it ever happen to the degree in your hypothetical? Absolutely not, which is a big part of my point: your typical consumer doesn't care enough about it for them to say "you lost a customer because of your color choice." And why is that? Because a typical customer understands that the color on a site's background has no influence on the vendor's service or their ability to enjoy the product. When someone shows me how the color at RPGnow affects how I enjoy any quality product I buy there once I've paid for it and downloaded it, I'll take back my comment about it being an irrational influence on such a decision. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
RPGNow EDGE Opens!
Top