Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
RPGNow paid reviewers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ghostwind" data-source="post: 2607406" data-attributes="member: 3060"><p>I'm going to add my two cents worth here...</p><p></p><p></p><p>It really doesn't matter whether the reviewer has bought the material or not. When writing a review, there are certain questions that have to be addressed and they need to be done so in a very fair manner. If this is done, then the quality of the review should be about the same. I addressed some of these concerns on this thread: <a href="http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=148769" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=148769</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>Have you read a lot of reviews? I actually find the reviews that are written by 'professional' reviewers to be more informative on the whole because they try to look at the big picture and how it applies to everyone's game, not just their own.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Have you ever sat down and tried to write a through review? If a reviewer does get a product at no charge, he is still investing a considerable amount of his own time into not only reading the product, but also writing the review itself (which can take anywhere from 2-3 hours if done properly). Publishers are not sending out copies as a bribe. They send out copies with the understanding that the reviewer will be fair and unbiased in their treatment of that product. If the review is negative, but well-written and fairly addresses the good and the bad, the publisher will appreciate it (he may not like the final grade, but he still appreciates it).</p><p></p><p></p><p>Honestly, I wish more folks were of this mindset. Just because a product is older shouldn't mean that you shouldn't do a review. There are a lot of gems that have been produced in the last 5 years that some folks may have missed. This is especially true for the 3.0 books that have been forgotten. I'd love to see reviews of these older books that include a section on how easy they are to use with 3.5 or how much conversion is needed.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I've wondered the same thing about my site, especially since James asked me sometime back that all pdf reviews we did link back to the product on RPGNow whenever possible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ghostwind, post: 2607406, member: 3060"] I'm going to add my two cents worth here... It really doesn't matter whether the reviewer has bought the material or not. When writing a review, there are certain questions that have to be addressed and they need to be done so in a very fair manner. If this is done, then the quality of the review should be about the same. I addressed some of these concerns on this thread: [url]http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=148769[/url] Have you read a lot of reviews? I actually find the reviews that are written by 'professional' reviewers to be more informative on the whole because they try to look at the big picture and how it applies to everyone's game, not just their own. Have you ever sat down and tried to write a through review? If a reviewer does get a product at no charge, he is still investing a considerable amount of his own time into not only reading the product, but also writing the review itself (which can take anywhere from 2-3 hours if done properly). Publishers are not sending out copies as a bribe. They send out copies with the understanding that the reviewer will be fair and unbiased in their treatment of that product. If the review is negative, but well-written and fairly addresses the good and the bad, the publisher will appreciate it (he may not like the final grade, but he still appreciates it). Honestly, I wish more folks were of this mindset. Just because a product is older shouldn't mean that you shouldn't do a review. There are a lot of gems that have been produced in the last 5 years that some folks may have missed. This is especially true for the 3.0 books that have been forgotten. I'd love to see reviews of these older books that include a section on how easy they are to use with 3.5 or how much conversion is needed. I've wondered the same thing about my site, especially since James asked me sometime back that all pdf reviews we did link back to the product on RPGNow whenever possible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
RPGNow paid reviewers
Top