Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
rule clarification: Warlock pact of chain and eldritch blast.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jared Vanotterdyk" data-source="post: 7454170" data-attributes="member: 6960091"><p>Ok, so i have a question i have yet to find an answer to. for the warlocks pact of the chain descriptions, the description says you can forego one of your attacks to let your familiar attack. makes sense in most cases. but it gets a bit more interesting when you have the extra attack feature offered by some classes and invocations.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I have found that most everyone agrees that any attack in the extra attack feature allows you to instead make an attack with your familiar, essentially letting you attack twice (or even four times if your a high level fighter) with your familiar. </p><p></p><p></p><p>but there's one instance that I've yet to see asked or answered. and that's with eldritch blast. eldritch blast is this really unique cantrip that scales with the caster not by just increasing the damage, but by making the caster cast multiple blasts, each with their own attack roll and additive bonuses. which is the main reason everyone agrees its the strongest cantrip. but this mechanic also confuses me in regards with this pact of chain familiar feature.</p><p></p><p></p><p>if you cast eldritch blast, can each attack roll made for the individual beams be counted as an individual attack for the sake of this feature, or do you need to use the whole spell to make one attack with the familiar.</p><p></p><p></p><p>if the latter is true. then it would mean the pact of chain,familiar scales much better into the later game than if not, being able to cast eldritch blast and sacrifice some of your damage for poison potential is crazy cool. but again, it all depends on whether or not each beam is considered an attack that can be spent to use your familiars attack.</p><p></p><p>so my question, is their a rule that determines this within the hand book? or would this be more of a DM ruling kind of thing?.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jared Vanotterdyk, post: 7454170, member: 6960091"] Ok, so i have a question i have yet to find an answer to. for the warlocks pact of the chain descriptions, the description says you can forego one of your attacks to let your familiar attack. makes sense in most cases. but it gets a bit more interesting when you have the extra attack feature offered by some classes and invocations. I have found that most everyone agrees that any attack in the extra attack feature allows you to instead make an attack with your familiar, essentially letting you attack twice (or even four times if your a high level fighter) with your familiar. but there's one instance that I've yet to see asked or answered. and that's with eldritch blast. eldritch blast is this really unique cantrip that scales with the caster not by just increasing the damage, but by making the caster cast multiple blasts, each with their own attack roll and additive bonuses. which is the main reason everyone agrees its the strongest cantrip. but this mechanic also confuses me in regards with this pact of chain familiar feature. if you cast eldritch blast, can each attack roll made for the individual beams be counted as an individual attack for the sake of this feature, or do you need to use the whole spell to make one attack with the familiar. if the latter is true. then it would mean the pact of chain,familiar scales much better into the later game than if not, being able to cast eldritch blast and sacrifice some of your damage for poison potential is crazy cool. but again, it all depends on whether or not each beam is considered an attack that can be spent to use your familiars attack. so my question, is their a rule that determines this within the hand book? or would this be more of a DM ruling kind of thing?. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
rule clarification: Warlock pact of chain and eldritch blast.
Top