Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="The_Spider" data-source="post: 1902872" data-attributes="member: 23903">Thanks rialla and others for help with interpreting this, so as I understand it he could wield a large waraxe in his primary for 1d12 damage, same damage and very much the same weight as a great ax in my opinion. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:"  data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> and could wield a medium waraxe in his off hand treated as a light weapon.This is monkey grip from the complete warrior by the way.Seems kind of wierd he can use such a large ax in one hand about the weight of a 2 handed great axe but couldnt in the other hand. What if he was ambidextrous? I know that 3.5 doesnt have it, its grouped with two weapon but still he could be ambidextrous and thus his off hand is the same as his primary. Monkey grip seems a bit broken, any thought s about maybe making a strength prerequisite?</blockquote>