Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rule of the Three (1st of May)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dkyle" data-source="post: 5897371" data-attributes="member: 70707"><p>Well, for me there is no engagement with the world without tools and rules. The rules are the expression of how the world works, and without that, I find roleplaying frustrating at best.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>If there's only an occasional flying enemy, then it is a player issue, not system issue.</p><p></p><p>If there are constant flying enemies, then I'd say it's a world coherency issue, which is a DM problem. If it's a world where melee is unusually weak, that should be made clear.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's just a tautology. Of course if two players choose to make two characters the same way, they aren't likely to have much individuality. So what? Anyway, that's besides the point.</p><p></p><p>What I was talking about was your argument for why mechanics for theme and background are bad. Your argument seems to apply equally well to <em>all</em> mechanics. As in:</p><p></p><p>Spells are bad because if the DM uses anti-magic fields, or monsters with high saves, the "crybaby" Wizards will complain instead of adapting.</p><p></p><p>Weapon attacks are bad because if the DM uses high AC monsters, the "crybaby" Fighters will complain instead of adapting.</p><p></p><p>AC is bad because if the DM uses high attack-bonus monsters, the "crybaby" Plate-wearers will complain instead of adapting.</p><p></p><p>Every single mechanic ever made is bad under your argument, because every single mechanic can be made less useful due to DM decisions, and there is always the possibility of some "crybaby" who complains instead of adapting.</p><p></p><p>I do not see any reason why mechanics from Themes and Backgrounds should be considered distinct from any other mechanics. So unless you have an argument for why they <em>are</em>, or you believe that all mechanics are bad, your argument strikes me as rather unsound.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course. And the more tools the player has to express the uniqueness of their character, through mechanics, the better.</p><p></p><p>But I'm firmly in the school of thought that <em>mechanics matter</em>. If a situation resolves purely through the use of well-defined mechanics, used by the players how they saw fit, that is the pinnacle of a good, well-roleplayed outcome. The more DM fiat creeps in, the less the mechanics determined the outcome, the less I feel like I'm actually "roleplaying", and the more I feel like I'm playing the game of "guess how the DM will react".</p><p></p><p>So taken from that perspective, sound character mechanics are absolutely essential to me, for good roleplaying of those characters to be possible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dkyle, post: 5897371, member: 70707"] Well, for me there is no engagement with the world without tools and rules. The rules are the expression of how the world works, and without that, I find roleplaying frustrating at best. If there's only an occasional flying enemy, then it is a player issue, not system issue. If there are constant flying enemies, then I'd say it's a world coherency issue, which is a DM problem. If it's a world where melee is unusually weak, that should be made clear. That's just a tautology. Of course if two players choose to make two characters the same way, they aren't likely to have much individuality. So what? Anyway, that's besides the point. What I was talking about was your argument for why mechanics for theme and background are bad. Your argument seems to apply equally well to [i]all[/i] mechanics. As in: Spells are bad because if the DM uses anti-magic fields, or monsters with high saves, the "crybaby" Wizards will complain instead of adapting. Weapon attacks are bad because if the DM uses high AC monsters, the "crybaby" Fighters will complain instead of adapting. AC is bad because if the DM uses high attack-bonus monsters, the "crybaby" Plate-wearers will complain instead of adapting. Every single mechanic ever made is bad under your argument, because every single mechanic can be made less useful due to DM decisions, and there is always the possibility of some "crybaby" who complains instead of adapting. I do not see any reason why mechanics from Themes and Backgrounds should be considered distinct from any other mechanics. So unless you have an argument for why they [i]are[/i], or you believe that all mechanics are bad, your argument strikes me as rather unsound. Of course. And the more tools the player has to express the uniqueness of their character, through mechanics, the better. But I'm firmly in the school of thought that [i]mechanics matter[/i]. If a situation resolves purely through the use of well-defined mechanics, used by the players how they saw fit, that is the pinnacle of a good, well-roleplayed outcome. The more DM fiat creeps in, the less the mechanics determined the outcome, the less I feel like I'm actually "roleplaying", and the more I feel like I'm playing the game of "guess how the DM will react". So taken from that perspective, sound character mechanics are absolutely essential to me, for good roleplaying of those characters to be possible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rule of the Three (1st of May)
Top