Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rule of Three - 04/18/11
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aegeri" data-source="post: 5533221" data-attributes="member: 78116"><p>Yeah, but these people are still unhappy because they didn't want a "Shadow" Wizard/Cleric/Paladin build. They wanted a genuine "Necromancer" and genuine "Shadow" classes. There were numerous threads on this over on Wizards, hundreds of pages long arguing about if HoS was actually adding shadow classes or not. </p><p></p><p>So really, by throwing more options into the Wizard (which HotF will do more of I would bet) and Cleric, I don't think Wizards have pleased anyone. People who wanted genuine shadow classes - not just a "Wizard" build are upset. People who want support for other classes, who are not impressed at all at seeing two of the best supported classes get even more support are equally annoyed. Really it has been a very lose/lose book for Wizards in many ways. It became obvious to me <em>last year</em> wizards couldn't genuinely win with their approach to this book. The reaction to HoS has been much more negative than any other book than PHB3 (which was divisive because of psionics and the races in it). Negativity over PHB3 was quickly forgotten because of just how damn awesome Dark Sun was looking. I don't see that sort of help for placating people as "Just a blip" on the schedule for HoS.</p><p></p><p>Going back to HotF, I honestly can't see how you put a runepriest/seeker into that book. I really can't. But I can anticipate one thing: <em>More god damn wizard builds</em>. Because we can't get enough of the same 4 classes! No siree.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aegeri, post: 5533221, member: 78116"] Yeah, but these people are still unhappy because they didn't want a "Shadow" Wizard/Cleric/Paladin build. They wanted a genuine "Necromancer" and genuine "Shadow" classes. There were numerous threads on this over on Wizards, hundreds of pages long arguing about if HoS was actually adding shadow classes or not. So really, by throwing more options into the Wizard (which HotF will do more of I would bet) and Cleric, I don't think Wizards have pleased anyone. People who wanted genuine shadow classes - not just a "Wizard" build are upset. People who want support for other classes, who are not impressed at all at seeing two of the best supported classes get even more support are equally annoyed. Really it has been a very lose/lose book for Wizards in many ways. It became obvious to me [i]last year[/i] wizards couldn't genuinely win with their approach to this book. The reaction to HoS has been much more negative than any other book than PHB3 (which was divisive because of psionics and the races in it). Negativity over PHB3 was quickly forgotten because of just how damn awesome Dark Sun was looking. I don't see that sort of help for placating people as "Just a blip" on the schedule for HoS. Going back to HotF, I honestly can't see how you put a runepriest/seeker into that book. I really can't. But I can anticipate one thing: [I]More god damn wizard builds[/I]. Because we can't get enough of the same 4 classes! No siree. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rule of Three - 04/18/11
Top