Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="am181d" data-source="post: 5861466" data-attributes="member: 3576">Almost all alignment disputes evaporate if you accept the fact that lots of different personalities and behaviors (some mutually contradictory) can fall under the banner of a single alignment.A lawful neutral samurai who follows a rigid code may find himself at odds with a militia of law neutral town guards if they disagree about whether he should surrender his katana.A neutral good cleric may disagree with a neutral good ranger about whether an evil spirit should be bound into an ancient tree at the heart of a woodland shrine.?You can't both argue that the alignment system isn't complex enough and then insist on interpreting it in the least complex manner possible. As long as alignments are broad categories and not a sort of choose-your-own-adventure sub-system for role-playing, then I really don't see what the problem is.</blockquote>