Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Riastlin" data-source="post: 5540492" data-attributes="member: 94022">Yeah this was my thought as well.  They can't give specifics at this time because they simply do not know what they are.  Heck, they may not even have specific submissions in mind.  It could be that they plan on contacting some of the more regular contributors (hi Mr. Schwalb!) and saying "Hey, you know what would be great is if you could do an article on X."  More to the point, even if they have a particular submission in mind, the editing process might change the nature of it substantially. Even the comment about the under-supported classes, while seemingly a reference to classes like the runepriest, seeker and artificer can't be made definitive until they know for sure its on the release schedule.  Sure, it would be nice if they were to say "We're releasing a new build for the Seeker in August" but they can't really do that unless a) that particular article is already finished and through the approval process and b) their release schedule is already set for then.  Otherwise as stated, its just another "broken promise".  I guess they could say "We hope to release a new Seeker build by . . . " but even that could be giving out false hope.  What if the proposed build gets reviewed/tested/etc. and its deemed not worthy of publication?  Now they're back to the drawing board.</blockquote>