Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mirtek" data-source="post: 5540512" data-attributes="member: 40810">Which is in no way different from the very same thing they kept repeating since after the first negative threads upon the announcement of Essentials started. Given their track record this could easily result in even more fighter articles. Which is what they didn't tire to confirm since the first complaints after the mere announcement of essentials. Which is a weakness they need to improve at. Much more complicated business are doing plans for the next 5-year with bonuses in 2016 depending on reaching goals set 2011. And they can even pin a 20 pages article with 10 new powers and 5 new feats for, lets say, August? Not even simply announce an article for such a class in 2011. This would at least show that they have identified the right classes as in need of support and their continued support for under-supported pre-essential classes won't be yet annother fighter article. Or they could get a grip on their business and become able to deliver on such promises.Other businesses are now tasked to budget how much of their specific product they will sell in Africa or Eastern Europe in 2012 (and have their personal bonus depending on that) and WotC can't even tell which articles they will have in August?E.g. they could have said:"Based on community feedback, we are going to make sure that we adress some of the most frequently named issues like feat taxes or melee basic attacks and we roll out support for existing classes and find ways to shore up classes that are seen as under-supported like the runepriests." No fixed time commitment, but at least a hint that they understood what the community gave as feedback and that we'll not see the hundredth fighter article instead</blockquote>

Verification