Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rule of Three 4/25/11
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aegeri" data-source="post: 5541385" data-attributes="member: 78116"><p>I wouldn't put it past Wizards to be dumb enough to think that would be a viable answer. Most of the "Heroes of Shadow shows there is support for old classes stuff" comes entirely out of the fact it has powers wizards/clerics can take. That's not really a satisfying answer to me and I'm increasingly believing print products won't offer support for non-essential classes. So if it doesn't fall into something a knight/slayer/mage/thief/warpriest etc could take, I've got a distinct feeling there won't be support. Now if they support old classes solely through DDI and not in books, that could be an interesting situation to plant themselves in.</p><p>Actually I have wrote two campaigns now, which don't have anything planar at all anywhere. From levels 1-30. Of course the epic tier gets really impossible for one of these games and I'm staring at a 90% "all my own work" workload with that. At the moment I'm seriously considering curtailing the campaign at level 19 or 20, because the amount of work will be murderous. At least my Dark Sun campaign will have a good selection of level 21+ antagonists to work with. Well, if I want a lot of elites and solos anyway (but better than nothing)...</p><p></p><p>In any event, Threats to Nentir Vale isn't strictly heroic. It actually goes to paragon and the preview they showed was of a paragon monster (Wandering Tower). The wandering tower was pretty great at that, doubling my disappointment there might be no epic monsters in it.</p><p>If this is their logic then it is seriously completely stupid logic. I may be more than skilled enough to do it all myself, but then the workload involved is really going to kill me in terms of time. Unfortunately skill =/ time, so regardless of my ability to actually do it the time I have becomes the limiting factor. I can run - every week almost - two campaigns side by side quite happily. I've been able to do this all the way up to epic as well. Once I hit epic it's like running into a brick wall: Suddenly all the options and choices (and potential reworkable adventures) go out the window. This massively increases the amount of work I have to do to make a viable epic tier campaign.</p><p></p><p>To be 100% fair though, my next epic efforts are going to be nowhere near as painful as previously (Due to monster design being <em>infinitely</em> better). But in terms of being a huge time sink, epic is going to take just as much initial work anyway in building new monsters, traps and similar. All things that should be addressed in products like upcoming monster vaults, which Wizards has stupidly decided shouldn't have significant epic tier content in them anymore.</p><p></p><p>I am looking forward to the adventures though, but now you've reminded me they might just throw out a two encounter delve and call it an epic tier adventure I don't think I'll get too optimistic yet...</p><p></p><p>I see great room for all tiers in both of those product ideas and think they would be a great idea. This means Wizards will never do it. Instead we'll get threats from the shadowdarkfell gloomshroud, which will have more heroic tier vampires, liches and mummies than you've ever needed before!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aegeri, post: 5541385, member: 78116"] I wouldn't put it past Wizards to be dumb enough to think that would be a viable answer. Most of the "Heroes of Shadow shows there is support for old classes stuff" comes entirely out of the fact it has powers wizards/clerics can take. That's not really a satisfying answer to me and I'm increasingly believing print products won't offer support for non-essential classes. So if it doesn't fall into something a knight/slayer/mage/thief/warpriest etc could take, I've got a distinct feeling there won't be support. Now if they support old classes solely through DDI and not in books, that could be an interesting situation to plant themselves in. Actually I have wrote two campaigns now, which don't have anything planar at all anywhere. From levels 1-30. Of course the epic tier gets really impossible for one of these games and I'm staring at a 90% "all my own work" workload with that. At the moment I'm seriously considering curtailing the campaign at level 19 or 20, because the amount of work will be murderous. At least my Dark Sun campaign will have a good selection of level 21+ antagonists to work with. Well, if I want a lot of elites and solos anyway (but better than nothing)... In any event, Threats to Nentir Vale isn't strictly heroic. It actually goes to paragon and the preview they showed was of a paragon monster (Wandering Tower). The wandering tower was pretty great at that, doubling my disappointment there might be no epic monsters in it. If this is their logic then it is seriously completely stupid logic. I may be more than skilled enough to do it all myself, but then the workload involved is really going to kill me in terms of time. Unfortunately skill =/ time, so regardless of my ability to actually do it the time I have becomes the limiting factor. I can run - every week almost - two campaigns side by side quite happily. I've been able to do this all the way up to epic as well. Once I hit epic it's like running into a brick wall: Suddenly all the options and choices (and potential reworkable adventures) go out the window. This massively increases the amount of work I have to do to make a viable epic tier campaign. To be 100% fair though, my next epic efforts are going to be nowhere near as painful as previously (Due to monster design being [I]infinitely[/I] better). But in terms of being a huge time sink, epic is going to take just as much initial work anyway in building new monsters, traps and similar. All things that should be addressed in products like upcoming monster vaults, which Wizards has stupidly decided shouldn't have significant epic tier content in them anymore. I am looking forward to the adventures though, but now you've reminded me they might just throw out a two encounter delve and call it an epic tier adventure I don't think I'll get too optimistic yet... I see great room for all tiers in both of those product ideas and think they would be a great idea. This means Wizards will never do it. Instead we'll get threats from the shadowdarkfell gloomshroud, which will have more heroic tier vampires, liches and mummies than you've ever needed before! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rule of Three 4/25/11
Top