Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 8942864" data-attributes="member: 23751">Some believed it could weld a broken dagger because by RAW it can.&nbsp; It's even mentioned in the spell description.&quot;It will weld broken metallic objects such as a ring, a chain link, a medallion, or a slender dagger, providing but one break exists.&quot;Yep.&nbsp; There's a gap between the two broken pieces.&nbsp; And I don't know what you are looking at.&nbsp; Broken is an adjective as it describes a noun. The dagger(noun) is broken(adjective).&quot;bro·ken/ˈbrōkən/adjective<ol>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">having been fractured or damaged and no longer in one piece or in working order.&quot;</li>
</ol>You're ignoring that a small break like in a slender dagger or chain links does in fact ruin those things without being large.&nbsp; You are conflating severe(ruined) with small(size).&nbsp; The break in the slender dagger is no more than an inch or two.&nbsp; It's small despite ruining the dagger.&nbsp; The break in a rope is less than an inch, despite being severe enough to ruin the use of the rope at its former length.If you changed the RAW to like that on me, I'd be upset that you basically wrecked a spell based on flawed reasoning.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 8942864, member: 23751"] Some believed it could weld a broken dagger because by RAW it can. It's even mentioned in the spell description. "[B]It will weld broken metallic objects[/B] such as a ring, a chain link, a medallion, [B]or a slender dagger[/B], providing but one break exists." Yep. There's a gap between the two broken pieces. And I don't know what you are looking at. Broken is an adjective as it describes a noun. The dagger(noun) is broken(adjective). "bro·ken /ˈbrōkən/ [I]adjective[/I] [LIST=1] [*]having been fractured or damaged[B] and no longer in one piece[/B] or in working order." [/LIST] You're ignoring that a small break like in a slender dagger or chain links does in fact ruin those things without being large. You are conflating severe(ruined) with small(size). The break in the slender dagger is no more than an inch or two. It's small despite ruining the dagger. The break in a rope is less than an inch, despite being severe enough to ruin the use of the rope at its former length. If you changed the RAW to like that on me, I'd be upset that you basically wrecked a spell based on flawed reasoning. [/QUOTE]

Verification