Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="smuckenfart" data-source="post: 8943702" data-attributes="member: 7040256">I don't agree that the spell mending makes reference to repair any object regardless of hp's, that's a player reading into it.I do agree that the quotes were from pathfinder, I did mention that, and that it was the only online publication that went into such detail as to define what &quot;broken&quot; means.&nbsp; It was also an illustration that the most recent public iteration coincides with the belief that an item reduced to zero hp is ruined/destroyed.&nbsp; I also believe the spell mending is very clear with how it interacts with the rules, the rules in the dnd books are guidelines, but not words in a dictionary.&nbsp; The words the authors use do not imply broken off or in two, that's players perspective that &quot;1 inch&quot; is small regarded as small, despite the fact that the term severed/cut off/broken in two is not.May I take a small sip of your drink?How much can I drink before you feel it's not a small sip?&nbsp; 10%?&nbsp; 20%&nbsp; 50?It's preposterous to me that people can't see the relevance there.The authors chose to say that it can mend small breaks, and a break is an opening or a gap.&nbsp; A clean break is not a small break it's the max.&nbsp; So long as the dagger has HP's and it is still attached, it can be mended.I would even be comfortable if the dagger broke because you rolled a critical 1, yet it still has 1 hp and could therefore be mended.&nbsp; Amending one rule, but not breaking the other rule regarding broken objects.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="smuckenfart, post: 8943702, member: 7040256"] I don't agree that the spell mending makes reference to repair any object regardless of hp's, that's a player reading into it. I do agree that the quotes were from pathfinder, I did mention that, and that it was the only online publication that went into such detail as to define what "broken" means. It was also an illustration that the most recent public iteration coincides with the belief that an item reduced to zero hp is ruined/destroyed. I also believe the spell mending is very clear with how it interacts with the rules, the rules in the dnd books are guidelines, but not words in a dictionary. The words the authors use do not imply broken off or in two, that's players perspective that "1 inch" is small regarded as small, despite the fact that the term severed/cut off/broken in two is not. May I take a small sip of your drink? How much can I drink before you feel it's not a small sip? 10%? 20% 50? It's preposterous to me that people can't see the relevance there. The authors chose to say that it can mend small breaks, and a break is an opening or a gap. A clean break is not a small break it's the max. So long as the dagger has HP's and it is still attached, it can be mended. I would even be comfortable if the dagger broke because you rolled a critical 1, yet it still has 1 hp and could therefore be mended. Amending one rule, but not breaking the other rule regarding broken objects. [/QUOTE]

Verification