Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rules Clarification: Fighting Style Feats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 9492617" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>No more elaborate than inventing feat categories so that pre-2024 feats couldn’t be taken at 1st level. And I wouldn’t say that making a level or two of Fighter, Paladin, or Ranger a requirement for gaining a fighting style through feats is minimal at all.</p><p></p><p>Well, no, the class feature already existed. They changed the way the class feature functions, in a way that has no apparent functional difference at all, except that it prevents non-martial characters can no longer acquire them without multiclassing. Unless you allow the Tasha’s feat to circumvent the prerequisite, in which case the change accomplishes literally nothing.</p><p></p><p>That doesn’t seem plausible to me. If they intended for the Tasha’s feat to be an exception, what was the point of even changing fighting styles into Feats in the first place?</p><p></p><p>But it gets around a restriction they clearly want to exist, otherwise they wouldn’t have re-written fighting styles to have such a prerequisite.</p><p></p><p>Correct.</p><p></p><p>Is it though? Every pre-2024 version of a Feat that has been reproduced in the 2024 PHB does nothing now. Fighting Initiate seems, in my view, to have been reproduced in 2024, just in the form of several individual feats instead of one single feat that gives you a choice of several benefits. But, due to the Tasha’s version having a different name than its various 2024 counterparts, it’s still <em>technically</em> selectable at tables that allow pre-2024 material (which is reportedly the intended default). And, selecting the Tasha’s version allows you to circumvent the one meaningful change present in the 2024 version. That definitely doesn’t seem like an intended outcome to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 9492617, member: 6779196"] No more elaborate than inventing feat categories so that pre-2024 feats couldn’t be taken at 1st level. And I wouldn’t say that making a level or two of Fighter, Paladin, or Ranger a requirement for gaining a fighting style through feats is minimal at all. Well, no, the class feature already existed. They changed the way the class feature functions, in a way that has no apparent functional difference at all, except that it prevents non-martial characters can no longer acquire them without multiclassing. Unless you allow the Tasha’s feat to circumvent the prerequisite, in which case the change accomplishes literally nothing. That doesn’t seem plausible to me. If they intended for the Tasha’s feat to be an exception, what was the point of even changing fighting styles into Feats in the first place? But it gets around a restriction they clearly want to exist, otherwise they wouldn’t have re-written fighting styles to have such a prerequisite. Correct. Is it though? Every pre-2024 version of a Feat that has been reproduced in the 2024 PHB does nothing now. Fighting Initiate seems, in my view, to have been reproduced in 2024, just in the form of several individual feats instead of one single feat that gives you a choice of several benefits. But, due to the Tasha’s version having a different name than its various 2024 counterparts, it’s still [I]technically[/I] selectable at tables that allow pre-2024 material (which is reportedly the intended default). And, selecting the Tasha’s version allows you to circumvent the one meaningful change present in the 2024 version. That definitely doesn’t seem like an intended outcome to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rules Clarification: Fighting Style Feats
Top