Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9492624" data-attributes="member: 18">I gotta say this does not seem very logical or reasonable. It seems like you came in with a view and are bending the facts and coming up with some very dubious interpretations (which is very atypical for you, not sure why you're so married to this idea) to try and support the prima facie ludicrous conclusion that you're allowed to take a Feat but it does nothing. I do not for one cold second believe WotC intended you to be able to take a Feat that does nothing at all. I don't think WotC is in the business of shadowbanning Feats as it were lol. I think the whole &quot;Fighting Style Feature&quot; thing here is just another poorly-worded bit of inept backwards incompatibility in the supposedly very backwards-compatible edition - that directly contrary to your view they weren't even considering Tasha's et al when they wrote this, they were thinking solely about 5E 2024.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9492624, member: 18"] I gotta say this does not seem very logical or reasonable. It seems like you came in with a view and are bending the facts and coming up with some very dubious interpretations (which is very atypical for you, not sure why you're so married to this idea) to try and support the [I]prima facie[/I] ludicrous conclusion that you're allowed to take a Feat but it does nothing. I do not for one cold second believe WotC intended you to be able to take a Feat that does nothing at all. I don't think WotC is in the business of shadowbanning Feats as it were lol. I think the whole "Fighting Style Feature" thing here is just another poorly-worded bit of inept backwards incompatibility in the supposedly very backwards-compatible edition - that directly contrary to your view they weren't even considering Tasha's et al when they wrote this, they were thinking solely about 5E 2024. [/QUOTE]

Verification