Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rules clarifications
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 4124914" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I think the ironic answer is appropriate, the question/complaint was lame. If you don't want to face a failure chance ever, play a diceless game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a good point, although of course there is no fundamental reason for the starting change to be 55% rather than 50%.</p><p></p><p>Generally speaking, the idea of making basically every ongoing effect to require a save every round is ok. The only problem is if you have 3-4 ongoing effects and you have to roll for all of them (certainly going to happen with BBEG). OTOH, you don't have to keep tracks of durations.</p><p></p><p>What feels a little odd to me however, is that there is only 1 saving throw. Some characters have a bonus against a specific effect type (e.g. poison), but there is no distinction into groups. IMO this is a bit of a mish-mash result from the fact that 3e saving throws have been turned into static defenses; once static, it would have required the attacker to roll every round (which is more difficult to keep track of compared to the defender rolling), and therefore they introduced the "new" saving throw, but not wanting to complicate things too much they just made 1 saving throw for everything. A bit meh for my tastes... I'd have left the "active" saving throws of course, but as a second choice I'd have simply made them use the fort/refl/will defense bonus.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't find the passive perception any off-putting. We've been using "Take 10" in Listen and Spot all the time... there is no reason in rolling both stealth and perception, one rolled and one static is enough.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Considering that I believe the 3e 5foot step was introduced mostly to let spellcasters and archers avoid AoOs, I'm curious to find out if archers will now be screwed in melee in 4e (spellcasters won't, since Melee and Close spells won't provoke AoO at all).</p><p></p><p>EDIT: forgot about "shifting"... looks like the 5ft step has not disappeared at all, it just changed name and can now be taken in place of a move, rather than in restrictive circumstances only (i.e. when not moving during the round).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 4124914, member: 1465"] I think the ironic answer is appropriate, the question/complaint was lame. If you don't want to face a failure chance ever, play a diceless game. This is a good point, although of course there is no fundamental reason for the starting change to be 55% rather than 50%. Generally speaking, the idea of making basically every ongoing effect to require a save every round is ok. The only problem is if you have 3-4 ongoing effects and you have to roll for all of them (certainly going to happen with BBEG). OTOH, you don't have to keep tracks of durations. What feels a little odd to me however, is that there is only 1 saving throw. Some characters have a bonus against a specific effect type (e.g. poison), but there is no distinction into groups. IMO this is a bit of a mish-mash result from the fact that 3e saving throws have been turned into static defenses; once static, it would have required the attacker to roll every round (which is more difficult to keep track of compared to the defender rolling), and therefore they introduced the "new" saving throw, but not wanting to complicate things too much they just made 1 saving throw for everything. A bit meh for my tastes... I'd have left the "active" saving throws of course, but as a second choice I'd have simply made them use the fort/refl/will defense bonus. I don't find the passive perception any off-putting. We've been using "Take 10" in Listen and Spot all the time... there is no reason in rolling both stealth and perception, one rolled and one static is enough. Considering that I believe the 3e 5foot step was introduced mostly to let spellcasters and archers avoid AoOs, I'm curious to find out if archers will now be screwed in melee in 4e (spellcasters won't, since Melee and Close spells won't provoke AoO at all). EDIT: forgot about "shifting"... looks like the 5ft step has not disappeared at all, it just changed name and can now be taken in place of a move, rather than in restrictive circumstances only (i.e. when not moving during the round). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rules clarifications
Top