Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rules Glossary packet6
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9059922" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>It is less that they don't know (though maybe they don't at the start of combat and figure it out part way through) and more how the game used to play versus how it plays now. </p><p></p><p>It used to be that non-lethal attacks were declared round by round, because they were a special sort of attack. This meant that if a player forgot to declare their attack non-lethal, then the DM could declare it was a lethal attack. And, actually, depending on the DM, this may happen anyways. I was playing a game and the player declared a non-lethal attack to take down a commoner... but they crit. And the DM ruled that since they crit, they amputated both of the commoner's legs and they were bleeding out. Because the damage was too high. </p><p></p><p>Now, the game rules could have allowed you to, at the start of combat, declare certain enemies were to be taken alive, but this causes some issues. It is possible the enemy you picked to take for questioning runs away, and now you don't have the option to take the remaining people alive, because you didn't declare it. Or you declared it and now you don't have the option to kill the enemy if something is revealed mid-fight that changes your mind. There are just a lot of potential edge cases. </p><p></p><p>So, instead, the game has set-up very permissive state. When you finish attacking and dealing damage, you can make the decision. This means you can react to a changing situation with ease, and there is much less chance of "well you didn't <strong><u>say</u></strong> you were attacking non-lethally, so they are dead" which became so common. </p><p></p><p>And if the only cost of that flexibility and ease of the players being given the option to spare the lives of their foes is that the description of an attack might be retconned before the end of the player's turn? I'm fine with that. I'm more than fine with that. Because the benefits outweigh the negatives by orders of magnitude. After all, an attacks description can change mid-attack (divine smite) so it isn't like there is no precedent.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9059922, member: 6801228"] It is less that they don't know (though maybe they don't at the start of combat and figure it out part way through) and more how the game used to play versus how it plays now. It used to be that non-lethal attacks were declared round by round, because they were a special sort of attack. This meant that if a player forgot to declare their attack non-lethal, then the DM could declare it was a lethal attack. And, actually, depending on the DM, this may happen anyways. I was playing a game and the player declared a non-lethal attack to take down a commoner... but they crit. And the DM ruled that since they crit, they amputated both of the commoner's legs and they were bleeding out. Because the damage was too high. Now, the game rules could have allowed you to, at the start of combat, declare certain enemies were to be taken alive, but this causes some issues. It is possible the enemy you picked to take for questioning runs away, and now you don't have the option to take the remaining people alive, because you didn't declare it. Or you declared it and now you don't have the option to kill the enemy if something is revealed mid-fight that changes your mind. There are just a lot of potential edge cases. So, instead, the game has set-up very permissive state. When you finish attacking and dealing damage, you can make the decision. This means you can react to a changing situation with ease, and there is much less chance of "well you didn't [B][U]say[/U][/B] you were attacking non-lethally, so they are dead" which became so common. And if the only cost of that flexibility and ease of the players being given the option to spare the lives of their foes is that the description of an attack might be retconned before the end of the player's turn? I'm fine with that. I'm more than fine with that. Because the benefits outweigh the negatives by orders of magnitude. After all, an attacks description can change mid-attack (divine smite) so it isn't like there is no precedent. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rules Glossary packet6
Top