Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rules Lawyers needed!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lamoni" data-source="post: 1811737" data-attributes="member: 12680"><p>Regarding initiative, Rather than focusing on the first round with some people having less time in their round, I only focus on the order. I know that in the rules that it says everything happens simultaneously, but I still think there has to be some sequence to it. Therefore, I think of it like this...</p><p></p><p>Time Action</p><p>0:00 Rogue wins initiative and moves first and attacks.</p><p>0:02 Fighter goes next and shoots a few arrows.</p><p>0:04 Wizard finally goes and casts wall of fire then moves.</p><p>0:06 Rogue just finished with his attack and starts his next action</p><p>0:08 Fighter just finished shooting his arrows and starts his next action</p><p>0:10 Wizard just finished his move and starts his second action.</p><p></p><p>This way, everyone is moving and doing things simultaneously, there still is order so having a higher initiative really means you go sooner, and everyone still has 6 second rounds. Of course there can still always be cases where it doesn't work like the example hypersmurf showed. It makes more sense to me to think of it this way rather than having everyone start their first action at time 0:00 If that was the case, delaying your action wouldn't be much of a delay. "I think I want to wait a bit until after my buddy goes so I won't do my action for another 0 seconds."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lamoni, post: 1811737, member: 12680"] Regarding initiative, Rather than focusing on the first round with some people having less time in their round, I only focus on the order. I know that in the rules that it says everything happens simultaneously, but I still think there has to be some sequence to it. Therefore, I think of it like this... Time Action 0:00 Rogue wins initiative and moves first and attacks. 0:02 Fighter goes next and shoots a few arrows. 0:04 Wizard finally goes and casts wall of fire then moves. 0:06 Rogue just finished with his attack and starts his next action 0:08 Fighter just finished shooting his arrows and starts his next action 0:10 Wizard just finished his move and starts his second action. This way, everyone is moving and doing things simultaneously, there still is order so having a higher initiative really means you go sooner, and everyone still has 6 second rounds. Of course there can still always be cases where it doesn't work like the example hypersmurf showed. It makes more sense to me to think of it this way rather than having everyone start their first action at time 0:00 If that was the case, delaying your action wouldn't be much of a delay. "I think I want to wait a bit until after my buddy goes so I won't do my action for another 0 seconds." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rules Lawyers needed!
Top