Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Rules & Regulations": An Essay on the OSR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6128766" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>The essay linked by the OP says this:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">It was copyright law, however, that made the old school renaissance possible. Copyright can be very complicated, especially in the internet age, but one thing remains clear: you cannot copyright game rules. You can copyright their presentation, the associated artwork, and the accompanying text, but not the rules themselves: that a dwarf gets a constitution bonus +1 cannot be copyrighted. </p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">The earliest iterations of OSR games, like the Old School Reference and Index Compilation, are simply various editions of the early D&D rules with new art and accompanying text offered as PDFs (often free) or print-on-demand at cost. </p><p></p><p>To the best of my knowledge this is just wrong. As I understand it, all the retro-clones use the OGL. Checking my own copies, this is certainly the case for OSRIC, Basic Fantasy, Labyrinth Lord and Lamentations of the Flame Princess. Which is to say that they are made possible not by the law of copyright, but the law of contract: WotC has licensed the use of its IP in return for users agreeing to be bound by the terms of the OGL, which puts more limits on the use of WotC IP than copyright law (and trademark law also) would impose on such use.</p><p></p><p>For what it's worth, I don't think the discussion of the relationship between 4e and roleplaying is any more accurate (I'll leave 3E players to make their own judgements).</p><p></p><p>The idea that combat is more prevalent mechanically is also not accurate, in my view - Moldvay Basic, for instance, has action resolution rules for combat, and for running away from combat, and for not much else - looking for secret doors and traps, listening at doors and opening doors. And reading the frequently-touted description of the winning team's play of the original Against the Giants Tournaments (in the Oct 78 number of Dragon), I don't see anything there that would not be at home in more recent editions of D&D.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6128766, member: 42582"] The essay linked by the OP says this: [indent]It was copyright law, however, that made the old school renaissance possible. Copyright can be very complicated, especially in the internet age, but one thing remains clear: you cannot copyright game rules. You can copyright their presentation, the associated artwork, and the accompanying text, but not the rules themselves: that a dwarf gets a constitution bonus +1 cannot be copyrighted. The earliest iterations of OSR games, like the Old School Reference and Index Compilation, are simply various editions of the early D&D rules with new art and accompanying text offered as PDFs (often free) or print-on-demand at cost. [/indent] To the best of my knowledge this is just wrong. As I understand it, all the retro-clones use the OGL. Checking my own copies, this is certainly the case for OSRIC, Basic Fantasy, Labyrinth Lord and Lamentations of the Flame Princess. Which is to say that they are made possible not by the law of copyright, but the law of contract: WotC has licensed the use of its IP in return for users agreeing to be bound by the terms of the OGL, which puts more limits on the use of WotC IP than copyright law (and trademark law also) would impose on such use. For what it's worth, I don't think the discussion of the relationship between 4e and roleplaying is any more accurate (I'll leave 3E players to make their own judgements). The idea that combat is more prevalent mechanically is also not accurate, in my view - Moldvay Basic, for instance, has action resolution rules for combat, and for running away from combat, and for not much else - looking for secret doors and traps, listening at doors and opening doors. And reading the frequently-touted description of the winning team's play of the original Against the Giants Tournaments (in the Oct 78 number of Dragon), I don't see anything there that would not be at home in more recent editions of D&D. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Rules & Regulations": An Essay on the OSR
Top