Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
RUNEBOUND: Boardgame Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iron_Chef" data-source="post: 1871351" data-attributes="member: 4530"><p>Hadn't thought of that, LOL. It still doesn't change my initial rating of the game much, though (maybe to a <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/glasses.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="B-)" title="Glasses B-)" data-shortname="B-)" />, as the major problems with Runebound were still caused by the incomplete, very hard to read and understand rules, (not to mention all the problems reading the dice and board) that come with the basic game. The game is only improved significantly when the unofficial AMPED rules (and some of the official erratta) are added in, IMO. The Advanced (official) Rules are complicated to the point of incomprehensibility, IMO... Who needs a page of new rules just to shorten the game (Doom Track)? :\ </p><p></p><p>Runebound is not a good game out of the box without some fairly major rules tweaks, leading me to believe the game was rushed out the door before it was ready. For example, the horribly unbalanced weapons that provide a permanent bonus to attack or damage that cost only 2-3 gold pieces... How those cards escaped playtesting is beyond me. However, the potential for a good game was certainly there... but again, it's only good and fun for everyone with major rules changes. Something we shouldn't have had to do if FFG was doing its job before charging us $50 for an unfinished game. Also, a storage case that actually held all the components properly and separate shouldn't have been too much to ask.</p><p></p><p>Thankfully, the rules changes (AMPED and a few house rules), combined with the Shadows of Margath card expansion really do seem to make a big difference in improving gameplay. But without them... <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/paranoid.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":uhoh:" title="Paranoid :uhoh:" data-shortname=":uhoh:" /> </p><p></p><p>At least the changes needed are either free (you can get the AMPED rules free from BGG --- BoardGameGeek.com --- by typing in Runebound and checking the downloads), or cheap ($5.95 for Shadows of Margath) and easy to implement (unless you're trying to comprehend the Advanced Rules, LOL).</p><p></p><p>I hope Islands of Dread continues to improve the game's clarity and playability. I do greatly appreciate the level of support materials FFG is putting out for Runebound (and so quickly). That's part of the shift in my attitude toward it and a huge PLUS in my eyes overother game companies who are either far too slow with expansions or never bother to release any, despite the popularity of their game (Avalon Hill and Days of Wonder, for example).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iron_Chef, post: 1871351, member: 4530"] Hadn't thought of that, LOL. It still doesn't change my initial rating of the game much, though (maybe to a B-), as the major problems with Runebound were still caused by the incomplete, very hard to read and understand rules, (not to mention all the problems reading the dice and board) that come with the basic game. The game is only improved significantly when the unofficial AMPED rules (and some of the official erratta) are added in, IMO. The Advanced (official) Rules are complicated to the point of incomprehensibility, IMO... Who needs a page of new rules just to shorten the game (Doom Track)? :\ Runebound is not a good game out of the box without some fairly major rules tweaks, leading me to believe the game was rushed out the door before it was ready. For example, the horribly unbalanced weapons that provide a permanent bonus to attack or damage that cost only 2-3 gold pieces... How those cards escaped playtesting is beyond me. However, the potential for a good game was certainly there... but again, it's only good and fun for everyone with major rules changes. Something we shouldn't have had to do if FFG was doing its job before charging us $50 for an unfinished game. Also, a storage case that actually held all the components properly and separate shouldn't have been too much to ask. Thankfully, the rules changes (AMPED and a few house rules), combined with the Shadows of Margath card expansion really do seem to make a big difference in improving gameplay. But without them... :uhoh: At least the changes needed are either free (you can get the AMPED rules free from BGG --- BoardGameGeek.com --- by typing in Runebound and checking the downloads), or cheap ($5.95 for Shadows of Margath) and easy to implement (unless you're trying to comprehend the Advanced Rules, LOL). I hope Islands of Dread continues to improve the game's clarity and playability. I do greatly appreciate the level of support materials FFG is putting out for Runebound (and so quickly). That's part of the shift in my attitude toward it and a huge PLUS in my eyes overother game companies who are either far too slow with expansions or never bother to release any, despite the popularity of their game (Avalon Hill and Days of Wonder, for example). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
RUNEBOUND: Boardgame Review
Top