Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="fba827" data-source="post: 5179393" data-attributes="member: 807">i was considering a runepriest as my next pc.  but after reading it over closer, there just seem to be too many "fiddly bits" and (based on past experience) that would cause trouble at my table with the mix of players currently there (we just don't do good with lots of fiddly bits: it'll frustrate someone if people are constantly being reminded of what affects them or not, or another player who will constantly forget what bonuses/effects were just told to him, or another player whose brain pretty much shuts down when you toss out additional numbers he/she needs to add that aren't already pre-added for him/her on the PC sheet).that's not to say it's a bad class, but i don't think it would work well in my particular group if played to full versatile effect. so figure out how good your group is with fiddly bits and make an assessment from there.  beyond that, it looks as good and flavorful as other leader classes, with enough distinctive tone so that you don't feel like any of the other leaders with a different label.</blockquote>