Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="UnknownAtThisTime" data-source="post: 5446543" data-attributes="member: 94582">I missed the question and have not read the responses yet, but my two cents: I think I agree with you Klaus.  I am DMing a player that is running a Dwarven Runepriest, and it is a very fun character.  His build is quite effective as well. He is really a leader/defender hybrid in practice.  He very much "makes sense" as a Dwarven Runepriest. Personally, fundamentally, I have the same 'problem' with a runepriest that I have with about 50% of the classes:  I think we are better served fluffing a cleric in to a Runepriest.  But the game model is what it is, and Runepriests can be powerful, and fun PCs.  Just because I'd rather see 6 classes and not 60 doesn't make the runepriest a bad option for the 4E game.</blockquote>