Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Runepriests
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5451730" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>Well, TWF powers come in quite handy, if you want to delve into it, since they synch up with your ability scores and melee-range focus and Striker role quite nicely. Those also give you broader equipment and feat selection, without hurting your ability to use <em>Synchronized Strike</em> even a little bit. </p><p></p><p>But the implication seems to be that cleric powers won't make you a better runepriest?</p><p></p><p>Well, they do, in the same way TWF helps you be a better beastmaster. </p><p></p><p>I get that it doesn't key directly into the specific schtick of the build, and I'm not saying there's not room to add support. Clearly, horsemasters and monkeymasters could use some support too!</p><p></p><p>But you don't see people decrying the lack of horsemaster support as the reason that people don't play horsemasters. </p><p></p><p>Because the few people that <3 horsemasters can make use of a broad existing pool of abilities that are already there that might not be directly related to horsemastery, but can enhance what they do anyway.</p><p></p><p>If runepriests were a cleric build instead of their own class, that the support need might be a bit less urgent, or less pointed. In the same way that no one's been clamoring for the necessary support for beastmaster rangers who happen to choose "serpent" as their companion, since those beastmaster rangers do have other options that play to their strengths that they can choose from the bigger pool of Ranger abilities. A runepriest could still make use of some specific build-support, but it might not be as vital, as urgent, or as necessary, since they could then choose from the bigger pool of Cleric abilities (think of them picking up Warpriest or Str-based cleric powers, forex...). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't see it as "at the expense of" anything. A runepriest that picks up <em>Levy of Judgement</em> can still use <em>Rune of Binding</em>, without any penalties or problems. A runepriest who wanted to take ONLY rune powers could still take ONLY rune powers. Only now, they could ALSO take MORE powers, that could help them a lot, even if they weren't rune powers, even if they needed a little re-fluffing. </p><p></p><p>Again, that's not to say that even a runepriest build couldn't use a Dragon article with some better feat options more appropriate to its schtick or something.</p><p></p><p>But that IS to say that if runepriests were a build instead of a class, they'd already be much better off than monkeymaster rangers, and you don't see people decrying the lack of support for monkeymasters, since WotC (cleverly) didn't make the monkeymaster into a unique class with 100 powers of its own. </p><p></p><p>tl;dr version: why does your runepriest need more support than my monkey? Cuz it's a class instead of a build.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 5451730, member: 2067"] Well, TWF powers come in quite handy, if you want to delve into it, since they synch up with your ability scores and melee-range focus and Striker role quite nicely. Those also give you broader equipment and feat selection, without hurting your ability to use [I]Synchronized Strike[/I] even a little bit. But the implication seems to be that cleric powers won't make you a better runepriest? Well, they do, in the same way TWF helps you be a better beastmaster. I get that it doesn't key directly into the specific schtick of the build, and I'm not saying there's not room to add support. Clearly, horsemasters and monkeymasters could use some support too! But you don't see people decrying the lack of horsemaster support as the reason that people don't play horsemasters. Because the few people that <3 horsemasters can make use of a broad existing pool of abilities that are already there that might not be directly related to horsemastery, but can enhance what they do anyway. If runepriests were a cleric build instead of their own class, that the support need might be a bit less urgent, or less pointed. In the same way that no one's been clamoring for the necessary support for beastmaster rangers who happen to choose "serpent" as their companion, since those beastmaster rangers do have other options that play to their strengths that they can choose from the bigger pool of Ranger abilities. A runepriest could still make use of some specific build-support, but it might not be as vital, as urgent, or as necessary, since they could then choose from the bigger pool of Cleric abilities (think of them picking up Warpriest or Str-based cleric powers, forex...). I don't see it as "at the expense of" anything. A runepriest that picks up [I]Levy of Judgement[/I] can still use [I]Rune of Binding[/I], without any penalties or problems. A runepriest who wanted to take ONLY rune powers could still take ONLY rune powers. Only now, they could ALSO take MORE powers, that could help them a lot, even if they weren't rune powers, even if they needed a little re-fluffing. Again, that's not to say that even a runepriest build couldn't use a Dragon article with some better feat options more appropriate to its schtick or something. But that IS to say that if runepriests were a build instead of a class, they'd already be much better off than monkeymaster rangers, and you don't see people decrying the lack of support for monkeymasters, since WotC (cleverly) didn't make the monkeymaster into a unique class with 100 powers of its own. tl;dr version: why does your runepriest need more support than my monkey? Cuz it's a class instead of a build. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Runepriests
Top