Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Running D&D 5e for Levels 10+
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 7289765" data-attributes="member: 15700"><p>Absolutely agree. I am not against adding extra things to monsters. Heck, A year or two ago I even released a product guide call<a href="http://www.dmsguild.com/product/189178/Monstrous-Leaders" target="_blank"> Monstrous Leaders</a>, which was all about adding extra abilities and traits to monsters, and how it might impact CR. So it's obvious I'm not against adding things to monsters if you want.</p><p></p><p>That being said, the impact of as you say, "playing with a brain", is often undervalued. It makes the world of difference in game play and challenge.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Someone mentioned this earlier, and I'm sorry I don't remember who that is to give credit to, but it is an excellent point. CRs are largely based on the baseline: the average table, may not even have feats or magic items, etc. So why would anyone allow an optimized party where players use all of the tools to min/max their PCs, but then don't allow the DM to do the same with the monsters? That doesn't make any sense. If your players are optimizing and using optional rules, then by all means you as the DM should be doing the same. RAW, a CR4 creature is appropriate for a standard encounter for 4ea level 4 <em>baseline </em>PCs. If those PCs are optimized, then it seems common sense to me that the CR4 rating is no longer going to work, and the DM will need to add things to it on the same level as the players added to their PCs in order to keep it a CR4.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 7289765, member: 15700"] Absolutely agree. I am not against adding extra things to monsters. Heck, A year or two ago I even released a product guide call[URL="http://www.dmsguild.com/product/189178/Monstrous-Leaders"] Monstrous Leaders[/URL], which was all about adding extra abilities and traits to monsters, and how it might impact CR. So it's obvious I'm not against adding things to monsters if you want. That being said, the impact of as you say, "playing with a brain", is often undervalued. It makes the world of difference in game play and challenge. Someone mentioned this earlier, and I'm sorry I don't remember who that is to give credit to, but it is an excellent point. CRs are largely based on the baseline: the average table, may not even have feats or magic items, etc. So why would anyone allow an optimized party where players use all of the tools to min/max their PCs, but then don't allow the DM to do the same with the monsters? That doesn't make any sense. If your players are optimizing and using optional rules, then by all means you as the DM should be doing the same. RAW, a CR4 creature is appropriate for a standard encounter for 4ea level 4 [I]baseline [/I]PCs. If those PCs are optimized, then it seems common sense to me that the CR4 rating is no longer going to work, and the DM will need to add things to it on the same level as the players added to their PCs in order to keep it a CR4. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Running D&D 5e for Levels 10+
Top