Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Running NPCs as a long-term party/team member
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wolf1066" data-source="post: 5182451" data-attributes="member: 88680"><p>Very true. And part of any good writing for <em>any </em>medium is to know your target audience and pitch your work accordingly.</p><p></p><p></p><p>My players are definitely in that camp. They enjoy interacting with the NPCs as well as each other.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I've always tended to ensure that NPCs that are going to interact with the team on even a semi-regular basis have backgrounds, motivations and personality quirks. And if one that was designed to be a one-off encounter unexpectedly becomes more "regular" than previously planned - perhaps (s)he was helpful and the players decide to actively track down him/her time and again - and role playing dictates that the NPC become more three dimensional than the initial sack of stats I drafted, anything that comes out of the resultant ad-libbing gets noted down and the character is expanded.</p><p></p><p>NPC charts I've drawn up aren't quite as full-featured as the PC sheets, but they do have scope for a lot of stuff should I need it.</p><p></p><p>As I'm running as near to "Real-life Cyberpunk" as I can, I feel I owe it to my players to provide my NPCs with realistic motivations and - if required by repeated contact - human quirks etc.</p><p></p><p>Fortunately, I love creating character concepts and can do it on the fly. I actually think my characterisation skills are better than my plot-building skills.</p><p></p><p>And my players certainly do enjoy interacting with characters and nutting out what makes them tick - motivations and goals seem to be the big thing the players are concerned with (hardly surprising, I suppose, in a Cyberpunk game where the questions are "why would (s)he want to help me? Are they on the level or just trying to win my trust long enough to get me into a secluded, dark alley?")</p><p></p><p>I also like throwing in little bits from NPCs to keep the game interesting or teach the players valuable lessons like "don't make assumptions".</p><p></p><p>For example, I came up with what I thought would be a fun little quirk for their fixer that would make her more of a 3D human than a stat sack - after all, she's going to be a regular contact whenever they want to buy something - and also teach them the "dangers" of assuming things in a fairly safe manner.</p><p></p><p>They met the fixer - female, friendly demeanor, pink hair - and order some stuff. When they come to collect it, a bloke brings the stuff out from the storage area, fixer says "thanks, babe". Team assumes - as I had intended - he's her sexual partner and comment. She says, rather offhand, "no, he's Amber and Mona's husband". When they recover from the idea that he has two wives, one asks, "who are Amber and Mona?" and the fixer replies "Amber's my wife." Hilarity ensued while the team tried to sort out the marital arrangements.</p><p></p><p>In that little exchange I established the fixer as a <em>person</em> with a life and a personality, conveyed the idea that the laws of this future are significantly different from the here and now (nice "we're not in Kansas any more" moment for the players) and showed them that making assumptions in my game is a silly thing to do - that knowledge may save their characters' lives some day...</p><p></p><p>Also provided a light moment and some enjoyable role playing. All in all, my little off-the-cuff idea that occurred to me a few days before proved quite successful.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Hehe, I can imagine that would be my players' reaction, too - sometimes it's best to give the NPC a quick and easy personality and motivations that the players can get a handle on in a couple of minutes and then get on with the adventure...</p><p></p><p>Thankfully, the character I need to run with this team was designed for an actual player to run - and has the same level of background info as any of the other player characters. This means that however far the <strong>players</strong> decide to drive the interaction, I have the info on hand.</p><p></p><p>I'm not going to play the NPC as someone who keeps volunteering all sorts of details to the party and interrupting game play/overshadowing what they're doing, but if they ask a question of him, there's going to be an answer in keeping with the character.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wolf1066, post: 5182451, member: 88680"] Very true. And part of any good writing for [I]any [/I]medium is to know your target audience and pitch your work accordingly. My players are definitely in that camp. They enjoy interacting with the NPCs as well as each other. I've always tended to ensure that NPCs that are going to interact with the team on even a semi-regular basis have backgrounds, motivations and personality quirks. And if one that was designed to be a one-off encounter unexpectedly becomes more "regular" than previously planned - perhaps (s)he was helpful and the players decide to actively track down him/her time and again - and role playing dictates that the NPC become more three dimensional than the initial sack of stats I drafted, anything that comes out of the resultant ad-libbing gets noted down and the character is expanded. NPC charts I've drawn up aren't quite as full-featured as the PC sheets, but they do have scope for a lot of stuff should I need it. As I'm running as near to "Real-life Cyberpunk" as I can, I feel I owe it to my players to provide my NPCs with realistic motivations and - if required by repeated contact - human quirks etc. Fortunately, I love creating character concepts and can do it on the fly. I actually think my characterisation skills are better than my plot-building skills. And my players certainly do enjoy interacting with characters and nutting out what makes them tick - motivations and goals seem to be the big thing the players are concerned with (hardly surprising, I suppose, in a Cyberpunk game where the questions are "why would (s)he want to help me? Are they on the level or just trying to win my trust long enough to get me into a secluded, dark alley?") I also like throwing in little bits from NPCs to keep the game interesting or teach the players valuable lessons like "don't make assumptions". For example, I came up with what I thought would be a fun little quirk for their fixer that would make her more of a 3D human than a stat sack - after all, she's going to be a regular contact whenever they want to buy something - and also teach them the "dangers" of assuming things in a fairly safe manner. They met the fixer - female, friendly demeanor, pink hair - and order some stuff. When they come to collect it, a bloke brings the stuff out from the storage area, fixer says "thanks, babe". Team assumes - as I had intended - he's her sexual partner and comment. She says, rather offhand, "no, he's Amber and Mona's husband". When they recover from the idea that he has two wives, one asks, "who are Amber and Mona?" and the fixer replies "Amber's my wife." Hilarity ensued while the team tried to sort out the marital arrangements. In that little exchange I established the fixer as a [I]person[/I] with a life and a personality, conveyed the idea that the laws of this future are significantly different from the here and now (nice "we're not in Kansas any more" moment for the players) and showed them that making assumptions in my game is a silly thing to do - that knowledge may save their characters' lives some day... Also provided a light moment and some enjoyable role playing. All in all, my little off-the-cuff idea that occurred to me a few days before proved quite successful. Hehe, I can imagine that would be my players' reaction, too - sometimes it's best to give the NPC a quick and easy personality and motivations that the players can get a handle on in a couple of minutes and then get on with the adventure... Thankfully, the character I need to run with this team was designed for an actual player to run - and has the same level of background info as any of the other player characters. This means that however far the [B]players[/B] decide to drive the interaction, I have the info on hand. I'm not going to play the NPC as someone who keeps volunteering all sorts of details to the party and interrupting game play/overshadowing what they're doing, but if they ask a question of him, there's going to be an answer in keeping with the character. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Running NPCs as a long-term party/team member
Top