Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Running player commentary on PCat's 4E Campaign - Heroic tier (finished)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Piratecat" data-source="post: 5066405" data-attributes="member: 2"><p>Not my problem. <em>He</em> doesn't know he only has one hit point, of course, although he's pretty clearly a tailor and not a warrior. They've been keeping him back out of the line of fire and he's been throwing daggers.</p><p></p><p>First, I've house ruled that everyone gets expertise - effectively a flat +1 per tier to attack. I try to remind folks that this applies to special stuff, too. (Hey, Alomir, Blackjack and Sagiro- this should also apply to alchemical items! We forgot that. Note it on your character sheets if you think of it.)</p><p></p><p><span style="color: darkorange">EDIT: As of 2/18/10, I've had my players get rid of the ad hoc expertise feat and I'm just reducing all the monsters' defenses by one. Way easier, as I'm the only person who has to remember a change, and it'll apply to every weapon and stunt.</span></p><p></p><p>Second, I often give an ad hoc +1 or +2 to attack with improvised weapons if they're cool, sort of a proficiency bonus they get for doing something cinematic. This doesn't always happen, but I want to make an improvised attack a viable choice AND I want to reward the player for being creative and cinematic -- that makes the game more fun for everyone and encourages the player to always be thinking. </p><p></p><p>Third, I generally use the damage numbers on page 42 of the DMG with the following guidelines:</p><p></p><p>- Is it clearly a one-time thing ("I leap onto one end of the broken tree, angling the other end up towards the charging monster like a pointy spear") that's unique to this fight? Be sure to use the limited damage expressions. If it's something that could be repeated every fight ("I shoot the monster in the eye with my arrow"), I use the regular expressions. </p><p></p><p>- The first time in a fight an improvised attack is used by a player, I raise the damage expression one notch higher than I would normally, just to reward the player for thinking outside the box.</p><p></p><p>- If the improvised attack is just doing damage, I lean towards the highest damage expression (whether normal or limited), then I lower the damage one or two notches depending on the effectiveness of the special effect that the player wants to add. </p><p></p><p>- I like the idea of making <em>each </em>unique trick into an encounter power - so that a person can try multiple improvised stunts, but each one only once. I'd allow a stunt to be used more than once in an encounter, honestly, but I'd mitigate the special effect and dial the damage down one notch each time to discourage this.</p><p></p><p>For instance, using the aforementioned examples for 6th level PCs: </p><p></p><p>"I leap onto one end of the broken tree, angling the other end up towards the charging monster like a pointy spear": Limited damage expression, as this is both cinematic and highly situational. 3d10+4 -- reduced to 3d8+4 if the PC wants the tree trunk to immobilize the monster.</p><p></p><p>"I shoot the monster in the eye with my arrow to blind it": This could happen every fight. Normal damage expression, start high and reduce by two levels because blind (whether <em>save ends</em> or <em>end of your next turn</em>) are both really good. A mere 1d6+4 damage plus the special effect, or bumped up to 1d10+4 if it's that person's first improvised attack of the encounter. </p><p></p><p>Don't sweat the numbers too much. 4e monsters have enough hit points that it's better to err on the side of more damage if you're trying to reward creativity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Piratecat, post: 5066405, member: 2"] Not my problem. [i]He[/i] doesn't know he only has one hit point, of course, although he's pretty clearly a tailor and not a warrior. They've been keeping him back out of the line of fire and he's been throwing daggers. First, I've house ruled that everyone gets expertise - effectively a flat +1 per tier to attack. I try to remind folks that this applies to special stuff, too. (Hey, Alomir, Blackjack and Sagiro- this should also apply to alchemical items! We forgot that. Note it on your character sheets if you think of it.) [color=darkorange]EDIT: As of 2/18/10, I've had my players get rid of the ad hoc expertise feat and I'm just reducing all the monsters' defenses by one. Way easier, as I'm the only person who has to remember a change, and it'll apply to every weapon and stunt.[/color] Second, I often give an ad hoc +1 or +2 to attack with improvised weapons if they're cool, sort of a proficiency bonus they get for doing something cinematic. This doesn't always happen, but I want to make an improvised attack a viable choice AND I want to reward the player for being creative and cinematic -- that makes the game more fun for everyone and encourages the player to always be thinking. Third, I generally use the damage numbers on page 42 of the DMG with the following guidelines: - Is it clearly a one-time thing ("I leap onto one end of the broken tree, angling the other end up towards the charging monster like a pointy spear") that's unique to this fight? Be sure to use the limited damage expressions. If it's something that could be repeated every fight ("I shoot the monster in the eye with my arrow"), I use the regular expressions. - The first time in a fight an improvised attack is used by a player, I raise the damage expression one notch higher than I would normally, just to reward the player for thinking outside the box. - If the improvised attack is just doing damage, I lean towards the highest damage expression (whether normal or limited), then I lower the damage one or two notches depending on the effectiveness of the special effect that the player wants to add. - I like the idea of making [I]each [/I]unique trick into an encounter power - so that a person can try multiple improvised stunts, but each one only once. I'd allow a stunt to be used more than once in an encounter, honestly, but I'd mitigate the special effect and dial the damage down one notch each time to discourage this. For instance, using the aforementioned examples for 6th level PCs: "I leap onto one end of the broken tree, angling the other end up towards the charging monster like a pointy spear": Limited damage expression, as this is both cinematic and highly situational. 3d10+4 -- reduced to 3d8+4 if the PC wants the tree trunk to immobilize the monster. "I shoot the monster in the eye with my arrow to blind it": This could happen every fight. Normal damage expression, start high and reduce by two levels because blind (whether [i]save ends[/i] or [i]end of your next turn[/i]) are both really good. A mere 1d6+4 damage plus the special effect, or bumped up to 1d10+4 if it's that person's first improvised attack of the encounter. Don't sweat the numbers too much. 4e monsters have enough hit points that it's better to err on the side of more damage if you're trying to reward creativity. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Running player commentary on PCat's 4E Campaign - Heroic tier (finished)
Top