Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Running the Tomb of Horrors in 3.5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PeelSeel2" data-source="post: 3883121" data-attributes="member: 35016"><p>I would rule that you cannot take 20 on searching for anything. The act of taking 20 implies failures. Failures, with search checks, have a negative consequence. Failure on a search check means that character fails to notice/find something, which is detrimental. If it is not finding the hidden treasure chest or finding the secret door, failure implies your character believes it is not their (and it may not in fact be their!).</p><p></p><p>Take a 40' long hallway with a dead end. In one scenario, their is a secret door at the end, in the other their is not. In the first scenario, the characters search for secret doors, and they fail to find it. They do not think a door is their. If they where allowed to take 20, it implies they go through repetitive failures of "it's not here, it's not here, oh wait, it's their suddenly!" In the second scenario they take 20 and get a bunch of failures "it's not here, it's not here, oh wait, it's not their!".</p><p></p><p>The two scenarios point something out. When a character fails to find what he/she is looking for, the character is convinced it is not their. Therefore, they cannot take 20.</p><p></p><p>In performing search checks I would rule how the characters describe they are searching will get bonuses to the roll. In the Village of Homlett, the characters had just defeated the bandit chief. The Bandit chief had hidden a chest of treasure under the rubble. Now the characters did not know it was their, they where just doing standard search checks to see if they could find something. It had a high search difficulty and normally the characters would have to get real lucky to find it. The player with the rogue said, however, "If I was a successful bandit chief and I had to hide my money from my men and interlopers, but I also need it fairly accessible instead of a pain in the butt to get to, where would I hide it being a sneaky person who thinks like that?" To him, I gave a +10 circumstance bonus. If it would have been a class other than a rogue who came up with the reasoning, I would have given a +5.</p><p></p><p>Along the same lines, I would rule you cannot take 20 on a spot check.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PeelSeel2, post: 3883121, member: 35016"] I would rule that you cannot take 20 on searching for anything. The act of taking 20 implies failures. Failures, with search checks, have a negative consequence. Failure on a search check means that character fails to notice/find something, which is detrimental. If it is not finding the hidden treasure chest or finding the secret door, failure implies your character believes it is not their (and it may not in fact be their!). Take a 40' long hallway with a dead end. In one scenario, their is a secret door at the end, in the other their is not. In the first scenario, the characters search for secret doors, and they fail to find it. They do not think a door is their. If they where allowed to take 20, it implies they go through repetitive failures of "it's not here, it's not here, oh wait, it's their suddenly!" In the second scenario they take 20 and get a bunch of failures "it's not here, it's not here, oh wait, it's not their!". The two scenarios point something out. When a character fails to find what he/she is looking for, the character is convinced it is not their. Therefore, they cannot take 20. In performing search checks I would rule how the characters describe they are searching will get bonuses to the roll. In the Village of Homlett, the characters had just defeated the bandit chief. The Bandit chief had hidden a chest of treasure under the rubble. Now the characters did not know it was their, they where just doing standard search checks to see if they could find something. It had a high search difficulty and normally the characters would have to get real lucky to find it. The player with the rogue said, however, "If I was a successful bandit chief and I had to hide my money from my men and interlopers, but I also need it fairly accessible instead of a pain in the butt to get to, where would I hide it being a sneaky person who thinks like that?" To him, I gave a +10 circumstance bonus. If it would have been a class other than a rogue who came up with the reasoning, I would have given a +5. Along the same lines, I would rule you cannot take 20 on a spot check. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Running the Tomb of Horrors in 3.5
Top