Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 9861830" data-attributes="member: 15700">Oh, I don't doubt it's here to stay.  I think it's going to be similar to the dot com bust though. It's not ecologically sustainable, but more importantly (to it crashing or not) is AI companies are investing in each other, just passing the dollars around to artificially inflate it's value. That's not sustainable either. Similar to how people put millions into a dot com that had no actual product or value.  Sooner or later it will crash. Then, also like dot com, it will come back, but a more stable.  That's my prediction anway.Regarding Goldman Sachs, a 5 year timeline seems worrisome. Right now, the AI we use is riddled with errors and mistakes.  I spend more time reviewing AI features and stories for errors than I would creating it from scratch. And inevitably some things will get missed.For example. just last week my team has a project implementing a middleware service called ECPA.  It's a newer service. We have another service called ECPR. When AI took the intakes and started creating features, it decided on its own to change ECPA to ECPR. If that went through and our developers got them, they would not only not code the right service, they would break the existing one, which would be a disaster. Then AI also doesn't know all the scenarios in which a user or client would use the system, so tons of missed workflows to validate.I was joking with my business analyst that I just hope AI stays sucky long enough for me to hit retirement.  This big push by senior management is just going to end badly if they force it to replace everyone when it's this broken. How does this relate to the topic? I think Ryan might be correct--in 5-10 years. If you leave it up to AI to design an TTRPG, you're gonna have something that makes Synnibar look polished. AI just can't handle context well or inferences of intuition when understanding mechanics.</blockquote>

Verification