Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Ryan Dancey & AEG Part Ways Following AI Comments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Firebird" data-source="post: 9863944" data-attributes="member: 7015803"><p>There have been some statements suggesting this idea in the long run, but I can't imagine anyone doing it seriously prior to profitability</p><p>.</p><p></p><p>An interesting recent result is <a href="https://www.digitaldigging.org/p/a-lawyer-a-road-inspector-and-a-cardiologist" target="_blank">Anthropic's hackathon</a>, where many winning entries were from folks with little programming experience but a lot of domain knowledge (e.g., a cardiologist). Whether the ability to make 'good enough' software extends to enterprise, I am not sure.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Can you share the post? I can't see it on Facebook (no account).</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think creatives are in a stronger place than technical workers because they are trying to capture aspects of the human experience that AI won't be able to. Creativity is often about breaking rules in the right way and at the right time, and it has a level of taste that AI can't replicate.</p><p></p><p>The change is instead that many aspects of what are now collaborative creative projects may be done by an individual. Someone with an idea for a movie, for example, can now achieve it without the same budget and without collaborators. They can go solo, as writing a novel would be. (Obviously not entirely solo. Have some charity in your reading of this, please).</p><p></p><p>With technical workers, there are rules and clear standards of success and machines do better at these kinds of constrained environments. There was a recent finding that <a href="https://hbr.org/2026/02/ai-doesnt-reduce-work-it-intensifies-it" target="_blank">AI use intensified work</a> (I think primarily technical work) because practitioners spent less time on relatively easy but time consuming tasks (e.g., data conversion) and more time making the hard decisions (e.g., prioritization) that AI couldn't. The harder-to-quantify something is, the harder it is to automate, so people whose job is to evoke <em>feelings</em> may have the longest legs of all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Firebird, post: 9863944, member: 7015803"] There have been some statements suggesting this idea in the long run, but I can't imagine anyone doing it seriously prior to profitability . An interesting recent result is [URL='https://www.digitaldigging.org/p/a-lawyer-a-road-inspector-and-a-cardiologist']Anthropic's hackathon[/URL], where many winning entries were from folks with little programming experience but a lot of domain knowledge (e.g., a cardiologist). Whether the ability to make 'good enough' software extends to enterprise, I am not sure. Can you share the post? I can't see it on Facebook (no account). I think creatives are in a stronger place than technical workers because they are trying to capture aspects of the human experience that AI won't be able to. Creativity is often about breaking rules in the right way and at the right time, and it has a level of taste that AI can't replicate. The change is instead that many aspects of what are now collaborative creative projects may be done by an individual. Someone with an idea for a movie, for example, can now achieve it without the same budget and without collaborators. They can go solo, as writing a novel would be. (Obviously not entirely solo. Have some charity in your reading of this, please). With technical workers, there are rules and clear standards of success and machines do better at these kinds of constrained environments. There was a recent finding that [URL='https://hbr.org/2026/02/ai-doesnt-reduce-work-it-intensifies-it']AI use intensified work[/URL] (I think primarily technical work) because practitioners spent less time on relatively easy but time consuming tasks (e.g., data conversion) and more time making the hard decisions (e.g., prioritization) that AI couldn't. The harder-to-quantify something is, the harder it is to automate, so people whose job is to evoke [I]feelings[/I] may have the longest legs of all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Ryan Dancey & AEG Part Ways Following AI Comments
Top