Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Ryan Dancey & AEG Part Ways Following AI Comments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LordEntrails" data-source="post: 9865592" data-attributes="member: 6804070"><p>I don't believe you that people who are pushing against AI are doing so effectively. I've asked on these boards how we can come up with effective actions to help. None of the anti AI folks had any interest in practical actions to reduce the harm that will be caused by AI.</p><p></p><p>All I see from folks who are anti-AI is "evil evil bad!" and the the most effective actions they support are complete bans/boycotts.</p><p>With the current growth and acceptance of AI in the RPG market and world, it's obvious such tactics are not working.</p><p></p><p>So in effect, anti-AI movement is not going to achieve what such people want, and they are unwilling to actually do anything that will. So all they are doing is voicing their opinions so they can be "right" and say "I told you so". </p><p></p><p>If it's not too late already, what are the anti-AI people going to do that is effective?</p><p></p><p>Really? Not washing your hands has a risk to evolve a human ending virus/bacteria. The risk is near infitesimally (sp?) tiny and so we all generally ignore that risk to humans. The development of nuclear weapons the risk has generally been considered high, high enough that society has taken action. AI is generally in the same level of risk (to me), but "we" didn't just assume the world was united on accepting that level of risk. Humans did not just assume that the risk was so universally accepted that parts of society did not work on providing data and support educating and discussing the risks associated with the technology.</p><p></p><p>Sure, go ahead and assume, go ahead and refuse to provide data or support for your views. But don't be surprised when you (anti-AI advocated) voice is ignored, dismissed and your (anti-AI advocated) actions are ineffective in reaching your (anti-AI) goal.</p><p></p><p>To me, this reply is not about supporting pro or anti, but more to point out that when someone wants to resist some common momentum, then you do need to supply data, rational and such. It doesn't matter how "obvious" the logic is to "you" or so apparent it "should be" to everyone, but since you want to change the default societal behavior, you're going to need to do something effective.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LordEntrails, post: 9865592, member: 6804070"] I don't believe you that people who are pushing against AI are doing so effectively. I've asked on these boards how we can come up with effective actions to help. None of the anti AI folks had any interest in practical actions to reduce the harm that will be caused by AI. All I see from folks who are anti-AI is "evil evil bad!" and the the most effective actions they support are complete bans/boycotts. With the current growth and acceptance of AI in the RPG market and world, it's obvious such tactics are not working. So in effect, anti-AI movement is not going to achieve what such people want, and they are unwilling to actually do anything that will. So all they are doing is voicing their opinions so they can be "right" and say "I told you so". If it's not too late already, what are the anti-AI people going to do that is effective? Really? Not washing your hands has a risk to evolve a human ending virus/bacteria. The risk is near infitesimally (sp?) tiny and so we all generally ignore that risk to humans. The development of nuclear weapons the risk has generally been considered high, high enough that society has taken action. AI is generally in the same level of risk (to me), but "we" didn't just assume the world was united on accepting that level of risk. Humans did not just assume that the risk was so universally accepted that parts of society did not work on providing data and support educating and discussing the risks associated with the technology. Sure, go ahead and assume, go ahead and refuse to provide data or support for your views. But don't be surprised when you (anti-AI advocated) voice is ignored, dismissed and your (anti-AI advocated) actions are ineffective in reaching your (anti-AI) goal. To me, this reply is not about supporting pro or anti, but more to point out that when someone wants to resist some common momentum, then you do need to supply data, rational and such. It doesn't matter how "obvious" the logic is to "you" or so apparent it "should be" to everyone, but since you want to change the default societal behavior, you're going to need to do something effective. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Ryan Dancey & AEG Part Ways Following AI Comments
Top