Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Ryan Dancey - D&D in a Death Spiral
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 4751218" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>lol</p><p>There is plenty there, both conjecture and non-conjecture, that may be addressed. You are using circular logic. You don't need to demonstrate a lack of substance because after all, there is no substance.... sigh</p><p></p><p>Of course, even if it was 100% conjecture, false conjecture can be exposed.</p><p>Go for it.</p><p></p><p>I think equating Dancey to an outsider equivalent to a total layman weather forecaster is either ill-considered or intentionally misleading.</p><p></p><p>That said, I do agree that it isn't that big a deal. </p><p>To me the amusing observation is that so many people toss his claims out the window (still without actually responding to the points themselves) because he "has a horse in the race". And yet the people most worked up here are the ones who take WotC comments as gospel. I find it quite amusing. </p><p></p><p>The benefit that other games would gain from a perception of D&D decline is minimal. Whereas the gain or harm WotC would see based on how the status of D&D is perceived would be much more significant. Though even that is far from the factor that will make or break the game.</p><p></p><p>I think that demonstrating a position as wrong is better than ad hominem attacks.</p><p>I think that declaring a position to be unsubstantiated and therefore refusing to offer any form of rebuttal is a very weak form of dodge. I think that consistently avoiding rebuttal and leaning on change-the-subject responses is pretty damning of the opposing stance.</p><p>I think even if Dancey is correct in his PHB2 claims, it is way over-stated to claim this constitutes a "death spiral".</p><p>I think WotC has vastly more reason to spin the data than Dancey.</p><p>I think that PHB2 sales are good.</p><p>I think that 9 months after the release of the game itself, PHB2 sales better be good or the game is in real trouble.</p><p>I think that, taken as a whole group, the 4E target audience is distinctly less inclined to buy a lot of supplements than the 3E target audience was. </p><p>I think the people who told me the edition wars would be over by the end of last summer were wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 4751218, member: 957"] lol There is plenty there, both conjecture and non-conjecture, that may be addressed. You are using circular logic. You don't need to demonstrate a lack of substance because after all, there is no substance.... sigh Of course, even if it was 100% conjecture, false conjecture can be exposed. Go for it. I think equating Dancey to an outsider equivalent to a total layman weather forecaster is either ill-considered or intentionally misleading. That said, I do agree that it isn't that big a deal. To me the amusing observation is that so many people toss his claims out the window (still without actually responding to the points themselves) because he "has a horse in the race". And yet the people most worked up here are the ones who take WotC comments as gospel. I find it quite amusing. The benefit that other games would gain from a perception of D&D decline is minimal. Whereas the gain or harm WotC would see based on how the status of D&D is perceived would be much more significant. Though even that is far from the factor that will make or break the game. I think that demonstrating a position as wrong is better than ad hominem attacks. I think that declaring a position to be unsubstantiated and therefore refusing to offer any form of rebuttal is a very weak form of dodge. I think that consistently avoiding rebuttal and leaning on change-the-subject responses is pretty damning of the opposing stance. I think even if Dancey is correct in his PHB2 claims, it is way over-stated to claim this constitutes a "death spiral". I think WotC has vastly more reason to spin the data than Dancey. I think that PHB2 sales are good. I think that 9 months after the release of the game itself, PHB2 sales better be good or the game is in real trouble. I think that, taken as a whole group, the 4E target audience is distinctly less inclined to buy a lot of supplements than the 3E target audience was. I think the people who told me the edition wars would be over by the end of last summer were wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Ryan Dancey - D&D in a Death Spiral
Top