Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sage Advice Compendium Update 1/30/2019
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7567539" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>Thank you for clarifying. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Fair enough. One minor quibble: each action does not necessarily spell out ALL the rules for it, but the rules it does include are undoubtably...rules for it...!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, but IF actions are indivisible, AND each action lasts until its effects end (specific for each action), THEN if an action's duration has not ended, no other action can be taken.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And if you take the view that the <em>reason</em> you can move <em>during</em> the Attack action between attacks is because it says so, this means that you <strong>cannot</strong> move <em>during</em> ANY action if the book <em>doesn't</em> say so!</p><p></p><p>Note that the rule for the Attack action does <strong>not</strong> give you permission to move between attacks! There is no mention of moving between attacks in the description of the Attack action on p192.</p><p></p><p>The reason we are certain that you <em>can</em> move between attacks is because it says so on p.190 under Movement and Position under Breaking Up Your Move: Moving Between Attacks.</p><p></p><p>IF you take the view that you cannot move <strong>during</strong> an action without a rule saying you <strong>can</strong> (I am not of that opinion myself), then in order to move <em>during</em> an action is if it says so under Breaking Up Your Move (it does not, except for the Attack action) OR it says so under the heading of that particular action. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed. However, it certainly does <strong>not</strong> say that you can move <strong>during</strong> this action! Therefore, with the previous assumption, you <strong>cannot</strong> move until ALL your movement has been expended, nor can you take any other action until ALL your move has been expended. So, with those assumptions, if you Dash then you cannot move(!) and cannot take any other action!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No. It does <strong>not</strong> say that you can move! It says that your movement doesn't provoke. It remains in effect until your movement is expended, but with the above assumption you are not <em>allowed</em> to move <em>during</em> the Disengage action because you have no written permission to do so! Not in the description of Disengage, not in the section on Breaking Up Your Move. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree that this interpretation would lead to 'silly'. But this position (position 1) is not that you Dodge for a moment and then stop while getting the benefit for a period of time; the position is that 'taking the action' is an instantaneous game construct decision by the player which allows the character to do the things associated with that action for the specified time. So 'taking the Dodge action' is an instantaneous event at the game table which then means that the character can dodge incoming attacks from now until the start of their next turn.</p><p></p><p>To remind you:-</p><p></p><p>1) is the position that 'taking the action' is an instantaneous player decision at the table which allows the character to do the stuff for a period of time</p><p></p><p>2) is the position that 'taking the action' and 'doing the stuff' are one and the same with the same duration.</p><p></p><p>2a) follows that actions are divisible</p><p></p><p>2b) follows that actions are <strong>not</strong> divisible</p><p></p><p>Which of these positions do you hold? </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I appreciate that, because in my view it is not possible to hold position 2b) AND the position that you cannot break up your move without text saying that you can! You <strong>must</strong> 'houserule' at this point, because that interpretation of RAW is unplayable!</p><p></p><p>However, it is of no value to debate what our houserules are! We can only debate the RAW and our interpretations of it. For me, the very fact that position 2b) and 'cannot break up your move without permission' positions result in an unplayable game clearly demonstrates that those are incorrect interpretations of the RAW! </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Since he cannot move <em>during</em> an action, he cannot move. This means that taking the Dash or Disengage action is totally pointless given those previous interpretations.</p><p></p><p>For me, all this clearly rules out both 2b) AND the 'cannot move during an action without permission' interpretations of the RAW.</p><p></p><p>This leaves us with the interpretation that you CAN move during an action that is itself a non-instantaneous event. The Movement Between Attacks section therefore is not something that gives permission, but is there to clarify that you CAN move between attacks in this new 5e system, unlike in 3e/Pathfinder.</p><p></p><p>It also means that either position 1) OR position 2a) must be true.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 7567539, member: 6799649"] Thank you for clarifying. :D Fair enough. One minor quibble: each action does not necessarily spell out ALL the rules for it, but the rules it does include are undoubtably...rules for it...! Sure, but IF actions are indivisible, AND each action lasts until its effects end (specific for each action), THEN if an action's duration has not ended, no other action can be taken. And if you take the view that the [i]reason[/i] you can move [i]during[/i] the Attack action between attacks is because it says so, this means that you [b]cannot[/b] move [i]during[/i] ANY action if the book [i]doesn't[/i] say so! Note that the rule for the Attack action does [b]not[/b] give you permission to move between attacks! There is no mention of moving between attacks in the description of the Attack action on p192. The reason we are certain that you [i]can[/i] move between attacks is because it says so on p.190 under Movement and Position under Breaking Up Your Move: Moving Between Attacks. IF you take the view that you cannot move [b]during[/b] an action without a rule saying you [b]can[/b] (I am not of that opinion myself), then in order to move [i]during[/i] an action is if it says so under Breaking Up Your Move (it does not, except for the Attack action) OR it says so under the heading of that particular action. Agreed. However, it certainly does [b]not[/b] say that you can move [b]during[/b] this action! Therefore, with the previous assumption, you [b]cannot[/b] move until ALL your movement has been expended, nor can you take any other action until ALL your move has been expended. So, with those assumptions, if you Dash then you cannot move(!) and cannot take any other action! No. It does [b]not[/b] say that you can move! It says that your movement doesn't provoke. It remains in effect until your movement is expended, but with the above assumption you are not [i]allowed[/i] to move [i]during[/i] the Disengage action because you have no written permission to do so! Not in the description of Disengage, not in the section on Breaking Up Your Move. I agree that this interpretation would lead to 'silly'. But this position (position 1) is not that you Dodge for a moment and then stop while getting the benefit for a period of time; the position is that 'taking the action' is an instantaneous game construct decision by the player which allows the character to do the things associated with that action for the specified time. So 'taking the Dodge action' is an instantaneous event at the game table which then means that the character can dodge incoming attacks from now until the start of their next turn. To remind you:- 1) is the position that 'taking the action' is an instantaneous player decision at the table which allows the character to do the stuff for a period of time 2) is the position that 'taking the action' and 'doing the stuff' are one and the same with the same duration. 2a) follows that actions are divisible 2b) follows that actions are [b]not[/b] divisible Which of these positions do you hold? I appreciate that, because in my view it is not possible to hold position 2b) AND the position that you cannot break up your move without text saying that you can! You [b]must[/b] 'houserule' at this point, because that interpretation of RAW is unplayable! However, it is of no value to debate what our houserules are! We can only debate the RAW and our interpretations of it. For me, the very fact that position 2b) and 'cannot break up your move without permission' positions result in an unplayable game clearly demonstrates that those are incorrect interpretations of the RAW! Since he cannot move [i]during[/i] an action, he cannot move. This means that taking the Dash or Disengage action is totally pointless given those previous interpretations. For me, all this clearly rules out both 2b) AND the 'cannot move during an action without permission' interpretations of the RAW. This leaves us with the interpretation that you CAN move during an action that is itself a non-instantaneous event. The Movement Between Attacks section therefore is not something that gives permission, but is there to clarify that you CAN move between attacks in this new 5e system, unlike in 3e/Pathfinder. It also means that either position 1) OR position 2a) must be true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sage Advice Compendium Update 1/30/2019
Top