Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7571030" data-attributes="member: 6799649">And the Attack action can equally be read as the DM giving you a token that says "you may execute all your allowed weapon attacks between now and the end of your turn"!The fallacy you're making is Special Pleading. Actions either are ALL 'instantaneous, with ongoing effects', OR they ALL 'have a duration'. Saying that some work one way and some work another, without written rules, is Special Pleading!NONE of them have language that tell you whether the Action itself lasts for its duration or is instantaneous with ongoing effects!The rules are silent on this issue. This is indicative that 'when an Action ends', as opposed to 'when the effects of an Action ends', was not considered to matter as far as the rules are concerned. This leads to the conclusion that 'Actions are indivisible' was NEVER part of the design when written, and has only become a thing post hoc in order for JC to justify his change of heart.Because, if it did matter, they would have made it an actual rule!</blockquote>