Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sage Advice Compendium Update 1/30/2019
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7573900" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>Sure I quoted the relevant part instead of the whole thing, and doing that <em>could</em> be a 'foul', <em>if</em> the entire quote would show that it would lead to the opposite conclusion.</p><p></p><p>But here, the whole rule has the same implications as the part I quoted; that '<em>improvised</em> weapons' are <em>not</em> 'weapons'.</p><p></p><p>"Things that are true, are true."</p><p>"Things that are not true, are not true."</p><p>"Things cannot be both true and not true at the same time."</p><p></p><p>Objects are what they are. Even if you <em>use</em> an object <em>as if</em> it were a different object, it doesn't change what the object actually <em>is</em>.</p><p></p><p>"<strong>Dueling.</strong> When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other <strong>weapons</strong>, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon."</p><p></p><p>Now, the original version said, "...no other weapon <em>or shield</em>...". I hated that they took the 'or shield' away. For me, I liked that there were styles for the four basic combat styles: single weapon, two-handed weapon, two weapons, and weapon + shield. This change, allowing the style intended for 'single weapon' to be used when using a shield, especially when shield-users got their own Fighting Style thing, takes away that 'single weapon' niche.</p><p></p><p>So I houserule the 'or shield' back into the Dueling style in games I DM.</p><p></p><p>But, if 'improvised weapons' <em>were</em> 'weapons', then I wouldn't need a houserule! Literally <em>anything</em> in my off hand would <em>be</em> a 'weapon', and would prevent Dueling style!</p><p></p><p>Got a shield? No +2 damage for you, because shields are weapons now!</p><p></p><p>Wearing a glove? Wearing a ring? Tough, no +2 damage for you, because they <em>are</em> 'weapons' now!</p><p></p><p>An object is what it is, and isn't what it isn't. It cannot be both at the same time.</p><p></p><p>A shield either <em>is</em> a 'weapon', or it isn't. Which is it?</p><p></p><p>If we were playing 3e, the answer is definitely 'yes'. Shields are on the Weapons table, as light or medium melee weapons, and can be used in TWF.</p><p></p><p>But in 5e, shields are <em>not</em> 'weapons'. They are not on the Weapons table, do not prevent you getting +2 damage from the Dueling style (unfortunately!) <em>on the grounds that they are <strong>not</strong> 'weapons'!</em>, and although you can hit someone with a shield via the Improvised Weapons rules (which allow objects that are <em>not</em> 'weapons' to be used to make an attack), they therefore cannot be used in TWF because TWF specifies 'weapons'.</p><p></p><p>As an aside (despite seeing the results of my last aside!), shields are not armour either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 7573900, member: 6799649"] Sure I quoted the relevant part instead of the whole thing, and doing that [i]could[/i] be a 'foul', [i]if[/i] the entire quote would show that it would lead to the opposite conclusion. But here, the whole rule has the same implications as the part I quoted; that '[i]improvised[/i] weapons' are [i]not[/i] 'weapons'. "Things that are true, are true." "Things that are not true, are not true." "Things cannot be both true and not true at the same time." Objects are what they are. Even if you [i]use[/i] an object [i]as if[/i] it were a different object, it doesn't change what the object actually [i]is[/i]. "[b]Dueling.[/b] When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other [b]weapons[/b], you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon." Now, the original version said, "...no other weapon [i]or shield[/i]...". I hated that they took the 'or shield' away. For me, I liked that there were styles for the four basic combat styles: single weapon, two-handed weapon, two weapons, and weapon + shield. This change, allowing the style intended for 'single weapon' to be used when using a shield, especially when shield-users got their own Fighting Style thing, takes away that 'single weapon' niche. So I houserule the 'or shield' back into the Dueling style in games I DM. But, if 'improvised weapons' [i]were[/i] 'weapons', then I wouldn't need a houserule! Literally [i]anything[/i] in my off hand would [i]be[/i] a 'weapon', and would prevent Dueling style! Got a shield? No +2 damage for you, because shields are weapons now! Wearing a glove? Wearing a ring? Tough, no +2 damage for you, because they [i]are[/i] 'weapons' now! An object is what it is, and isn't what it isn't. It cannot be both at the same time. A shield either [i]is[/i] a 'weapon', or it isn't. Which is it? If we were playing 3e, the answer is definitely 'yes'. Shields are on the Weapons table, as light or medium melee weapons, and can be used in TWF. But in 5e, shields are [i]not[/i] 'weapons'. They are not on the Weapons table, do not prevent you getting +2 damage from the Dueling style (unfortunately!) [i]on the grounds that they are [b]not[/b] 'weapons'![/i], and although you can hit someone with a shield via the Improvised Weapons rules (which allow objects that are [i]not[/i] 'weapons' to be used to make an attack), they therefore cannot be used in TWF because TWF specifies 'weapons'. As an aside (despite seeing the results of my last aside!), shields are not armour either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sage Advice Compendium Update 1/30/2019
Top