Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sage Advice Compendium Update 1/30/2019
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 7575394" data-attributes="member: 6987520"><p>Well said! Of course, I don't know so much about the reference to Jeremy pulling something out of his posterior...</p><p></p><p>Otherwise, I think you are right. While my posts have been vehemently in favor of understanding the official stance, I don't agree with it either. Like you I agree the Shove attack works narratively coming first, in the middle, or last. It makes no difference to me personally and I would play with a DM who runs it either way without any qualms. I feel it is more useful allowing the Shove to happen first, but not essential. Other aspects of the feat are still very good given the proper situations.</p><p></p><p>Writing Shield Master as "If you take the Attack action on your turn, you may take an additional attack that you can use to shove a creature within 5 feet of you with your shield."</p><p></p><p>Now, this doesn't cost action economy since you aren't spending your Bonus action, but it shouldn't be OP even given that and further testing would prove it out either way. It could be worded that making the additional attack to shove deprives you of taking any bonus action on that turn.</p><p></p><p>Another option would be this (or along similar lines)</p><p></p><p>"If you use one of your attacks to shove a creature on your turn, you gain advantage on the Strength (Athletics) check for that attack by using your shield."</p><p></p><p>Again, word to deprive bonus action or not.</p><p></p><p>In SA Jeremy comments that the Eldritch Knight ability, War Magic, "That said, a DM would break nothing in the system by allowing an Eldritch Knight to reverse the order of the cantrip and the weapon attack."</p><p></p><p>Does it break anything by allowing the shove prior to the attack? Probably not. However, apparently enough issues came up that the powers that be felt it was important to reverse his prior ruling. And so now we are stuck with the shove coming after you've completed the Attack action as a whole. People can house-rule it or ignore the reversal if it suits their game, or just play without Feats and then they don't have to worry about it at all! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 7575394, member: 6987520"] Well said! Of course, I don't know so much about the reference to Jeremy pulling something out of his posterior... Otherwise, I think you are right. While my posts have been vehemently in favor of understanding the official stance, I don't agree with it either. Like you I agree the Shove attack works narratively coming first, in the middle, or last. It makes no difference to me personally and I would play with a DM who runs it either way without any qualms. I feel it is more useful allowing the Shove to happen first, but not essential. Other aspects of the feat are still very good given the proper situations. Writing Shield Master as "If you take the Attack action on your turn, you may take an additional attack that you can use to shove a creature within 5 feet of you with your shield." Now, this doesn't cost action economy since you aren't spending your Bonus action, but it shouldn't be OP even given that and further testing would prove it out either way. It could be worded that making the additional attack to shove deprives you of taking any bonus action on that turn. Another option would be this (or along similar lines) "If you use one of your attacks to shove a creature on your turn, you gain advantage on the Strength (Athletics) check for that attack by using your shield." Again, word to deprive bonus action or not. In SA Jeremy comments that the Eldritch Knight ability, War Magic, "That said, a DM would break nothing in the system by allowing an Eldritch Knight to reverse the order of the cantrip and the weapon attack." Does it break anything by allowing the shove prior to the attack? Probably not. However, apparently enough issues came up that the powers that be felt it was important to reverse his prior ruling. And so now we are stuck with the shove coming after you've completed the Attack action as a whole. People can house-rule it or ignore the reversal if it suits their game, or just play without Feats and then they don't have to worry about it at all! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sage Advice Compendium Update 1/30/2019
Top