Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 7575851" data-attributes="member: 6795602">I think in 2021 he's going to be coming out and saying I F'd things up again.  I think he had the right ruling early on but the wrong explanation.  The original ruling was spot on but his justification for it was terrible IMO.  He definitely needed to go back and correct his faulty justification.  The If X then Y talk by JC proves the anytime bonus action justification was terrible.  But a bad justification doesn't invalidate a correct ruling.The issue is that now he's using the "attack action happens at the same time as your attacks" as his justification.  That to is going to ultimately prove to be a faulty justification that he's going to have to go back and correct.  For example, it's already inadvertently changed TWF rules and he's already dug in so far he refuses to acknowledge that.  Eventually he's going to come out with the correct ruling and valid justification combination.  It's just by the time he does no one is going to listen to him because his credibility is shot.</blockquote>