Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sage Advice Compendium Update 1/30/2019
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 7577162" data-attributes="member: 6987520"><p>Then again, you may not, which leads to paradox since the condition required to gain the bonus action was that you take the Attack action on your turn.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, the problem is you are employing a bonus action granted by a feature and didn't satisfy the requirements of the feat to gain the bonus action. That is breaking the rule of gaining bonus actions allowed by satisfying conditions to gain them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I never said it wasn't and that is immaterial to the argument.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Accept that to gain the bonus action shove you must take the Action. I have shown numerous examples of how it leads to paradox if you use your bonus action to shove before you attack because you can be denied the attack later on.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And if you look at the SA response, he states that allowing you to make the attack before casting the cantrip would probably not break anything. Clearly he felt it could break things if you allow the shove to precede the Attack action via Shield Master.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And what if you can't? Then what? You have benefited from a bonus action granted by a feat and never met the requirements to gain said bonus action.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, you are either not understanding that bonus actions require you to satisfy the conditions needed to have them or there are none. In this case, the requirement is the Attack action, if you never attack, you should NOT have gained the bonus action. You continue to believe you can use the bonus action first even though you could be denied your Attack action later on. If you want to ignore the requirements for Shield Master in situations when you have NO Attack action, that is up to you. Play on!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, we disagree on that obviously. It is your opinion as to what was intended on how play was suppose to be, but obviously the lead game designer feels otherwise. Ignore him if you want.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, but if you use your Attack action and your attack granted by that action to attempt to shove, that is using the Attack action and allows the bonus action to Shove from Shield Master. But notice you are in fact using your Attack action before you gain the bonus action. But you can't use the bonus action shove first to attempt to shove unless it is preceded by the Attack action.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>LOL from everything you say you obviously do NOT understand the official ruling, whether you agree with it or not. However we agree, no amount of me explaining that to you will change your understanding if you refuse to change it. Perhaps face-to-face we would be more successful at meeting a mutual resolution, but it obvious though posts the only resolution is agreeing to disagree. Play on!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 7577162, member: 6987520"] Then again, you may not, which leads to paradox since the condition required to gain the bonus action was that you take the Attack action on your turn. Again, the problem is you are employing a bonus action granted by a feature and didn't satisfy the requirements of the feat to gain the bonus action. That is breaking the rule of gaining bonus actions allowed by satisfying conditions to gain them. I never said it wasn't and that is immaterial to the argument. Accept that to gain the bonus action shove you must take the Action. I have shown numerous examples of how it leads to paradox if you use your bonus action to shove before you attack because you can be denied the attack later on. And if you look at the SA response, he states that allowing you to make the attack before casting the cantrip would probably not break anything. Clearly he felt it could break things if you allow the shove to precede the Attack action via Shield Master. And what if you can't? Then what? You have benefited from a bonus action granted by a feat and never met the requirements to gain said bonus action. Again, you are either not understanding that bonus actions require you to satisfy the conditions needed to have them or there are none. In this case, the requirement is the Attack action, if you never attack, you should NOT have gained the bonus action. You continue to believe you can use the bonus action first even though you could be denied your Attack action later on. If you want to ignore the requirements for Shield Master in situations when you have NO Attack action, that is up to you. Play on! Well, we disagree on that obviously. It is your opinion as to what was intended on how play was suppose to be, but obviously the lead game designer feels otherwise. Ignore him if you want. Sure, but if you use your Attack action and your attack granted by that action to attempt to shove, that is using the Attack action and allows the bonus action to Shove from Shield Master. But notice you are in fact using your Attack action before you gain the bonus action. But you can't use the bonus action shove first to attempt to shove unless it is preceded by the Attack action. LOL from everything you say you obviously do NOT understand the official ruling, whether you agree with it or not. However we agree, no amount of me explaining that to you will change your understanding if you refuse to change it. Perhaps face-to-face we would be more successful at meeting a mutual resolution, but it obvious though posts the only resolution is agreeing to disagree. Play on! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sage Advice Compendium Update 1/30/2019
Top