Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sage Answer: Haste & 5ft Step(s)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Artoomis" data-source="post: 48451" data-attributes="member: 111"><p>Virago:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, I admit I am weak. I got sucked in because I saw a slightly different spin to the discussion - a look at whether 5-foot steps are tied to actions or to a round.</p><p></p><p>As for not acknowledging the other side - I've done that plenty of times in the other thread, and, as I've said before, you are certainly free to "house rule" as you like. The "other side" seems to me to have most of their argument based on how they think the rules <strong><em>should</em></strong> work, as opposed to what is stated in the rules. </p><p></p><p>I'm only trying to look at the rules themselves to see how they work within the context of the core rules only. Within that context I think I've made my case pretty well and I've yet to see a really good counter-argument that does not at least want to assume that a round does not equal a round when hasted. The haste spell itself gives you an extra partial action - within the context of a round.</p><p></p><p>In fact, by the rules themselves, a haste spell does not let you finish a spell with a casting time of 1 round on your turn - that's a Sage interpretation. The language itself would directly support using your partial action first, then casting your spell, thus preserving your extra action by using it first. I don't have a problem with using the extra partial action to finish your spell. In fact, I think it dovetails nicely with the rule on using partial actions to begin a full-round action. I'm just pointing out how the rules are written.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying a 5-foot step shouldn't be allowed with haste - it just so happens that the rules say otherwise.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure I've made my point well, so let me restate:</p><p></p><p>The rules say only one 5-foot step is allowed per round.</p><p></p><p>This in no way means that you shouldn't allow an extra 5-foot step for haste, if you think that's appropriate. It ups the power of haste just a bit from the rules as written.</p><p></p><p>Finally, let's face it, the rules as written did not get as much review as we might like to think they did. You may think that haste <strong>should</strong> give an extra 5-foot step per round - if that's the case, go for it. But a strict rules-based argument won't fly to make your case.</p><p></p><p>I'm pretty sure that even Spikey (who, I think, really likes the extra 5-foot step from haste) would agree with me on that last point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Artoomis, post: 48451, member: 111"] Virago: Well, I admit I am weak. I got sucked in because I saw a slightly different spin to the discussion - a look at whether 5-foot steps are tied to actions or to a round. As for not acknowledging the other side - I've done that plenty of times in the other thread, and, as I've said before, you are certainly free to "house rule" as you like. The "other side" seems to me to have most of their argument based on how they think the rules [b][i]should[/i][/b][i][/i] work, as opposed to what is stated in the rules. I'm only trying to look at the rules themselves to see how they work within the context of the core rules only. Within that context I think I've made my case pretty well and I've yet to see a really good counter-argument that does not at least want to assume that a round does not equal a round when hasted. The haste spell itself gives you an extra partial action - within the context of a round. In fact, by the rules themselves, a haste spell does not let you finish a spell with a casting time of 1 round on your turn - that's a Sage interpretation. The language itself would directly support using your partial action first, then casting your spell, thus preserving your extra action by using it first. I don't have a problem with using the extra partial action to finish your spell. In fact, I think it dovetails nicely with the rule on using partial actions to begin a full-round action. I'm just pointing out how the rules are written. I'm not saying a 5-foot step shouldn't be allowed with haste - it just so happens that the rules say otherwise. I'm not sure I've made my point well, so let me restate: The rules say only one 5-foot step is allowed per round. This in no way means that you shouldn't allow an extra 5-foot step for haste, if you think that's appropriate. It ups the power of haste just a bit from the rules as written. Finally, let's face it, the rules as written did not get as much review as we might like to think they did. You may think that haste [b]should[/b] give an extra 5-foot step per round - if that's the case, go for it. But a strict rules-based argument won't fly to make your case. I'm pretty sure that even Spikey (who, I think, really likes the extra 5-foot step from haste) would agree with me on that last point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sage Answer: Haste & 5ft Step(s)
Top