Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Salvageable Innovations from 4e for Nonenthusiasts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JamesonCourage" data-source="post: 5596727" data-attributes="member: 6668292"><p>I think the miscommunication arises when people say "everyone is mooks, even to first level characters."</p><p></p><p>That's when some people say "that's not as simulationist, because first level characters are obviously weak, too" and others disagree, saying "no, first level characters are better than 90% or more of the world.</p><p></p><p>Now, we have people with two legitimate takes on setting arguing over something without addressing the real issue. If 90% of the people in a given setting are really worse than first level PCs, then yeah, maybe most people are mooks. In other games where the average level might be closer to 2, 3, or 5, and the players start off at first level, this looks obviously false.</p><p></p><p>Also, people have different perceptions on how high "Aragorn" is supposed to be, ideally. Yeah, everyone is still a mook, even at 5th level, if the PCs are 20th level. However, if you expect to be Aragorn at 5th level because in your setting, orcs are 1st level, then you're still not communicating the problem.</p><p></p><p>You're saying (not you, but theoretically someone) that "in my game, orcs must be 1st level, so that Aragorn might kill them easily." Other people say, "in my game, orcs are 5th level, and Aragorn would still kill them easily."</p><p></p><p>That's because the statements aren't communicating other facts, such as average level (or hit die) in your setting, what level Aragorn is within said setting, etc.</p><p></p><p>Just my take on a possible miscommunication taking place. Maybe I'm way off base, but I think either side making assumptions might be skipping a step.</p><p></p><p>Anyways, I'm not saying either side is wrong, just trying to help out. I'm also not judging either play style. As always, play what you like <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JamesonCourage, post: 5596727, member: 6668292"] I think the miscommunication arises when people say "everyone is mooks, even to first level characters." That's when some people say "that's not as simulationist, because first level characters are obviously weak, too" and others disagree, saying "no, first level characters are better than 90% or more of the world. Now, we have people with two legitimate takes on setting arguing over something without addressing the real issue. If 90% of the people in a given setting are really worse than first level PCs, then yeah, maybe most people are mooks. In other games where the average level might be closer to 2, 3, or 5, and the players start off at first level, this looks obviously false. Also, people have different perceptions on how high "Aragorn" is supposed to be, ideally. Yeah, everyone is still a mook, even at 5th level, if the PCs are 20th level. However, if you expect to be Aragorn at 5th level because in your setting, orcs are 1st level, then you're still not communicating the problem. You're saying (not you, but theoretically someone) that "in my game, orcs must be 1st level, so that Aragorn might kill them easily." Other people say, "in my game, orcs are 5th level, and Aragorn would still kill them easily." That's because the statements aren't communicating other facts, such as average level (or hit die) in your setting, what level Aragorn is within said setting, etc. Just my take on a possible miscommunication taking place. Maybe I'm way off base, but I think either side making assumptions might be skipping a step. Anyways, I'm not saying either side is wrong, just trying to help out. I'm also not judging either play style. As always, play what you like :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Salvageable Innovations from 4e for Nonenthusiasts
Top