Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 5773801" data-attributes="member: 5142">First. Would you mind stop treating people, including myself, so condescendingly? Thanks. I'd really appreciate it. Now let's move on to your other points. From which you can't presume to know. It's not a truth. But then again, neither is &quot;NPCs should be consistent with PCs.&quot; And it's utterly bizarre that you would expect me to explain this as &quot;a truth&quot; when it's not framed as such in the first place. And this is where I see the lip-service, because it presumes &quot;Concessions in 5E should be about me!&quot; You are expecting repeatedly that the game bends to your expectations. I suppose it's only natural, but you have made a number of comments here and elsewhere about &quot;deal breaker&quot; things in 5E. It's not about what works best or what's best for the whole, but about those who do not play 4E, but these are the same people who played 1-2E which operated just as it did in 4E. So why is this framed in terms of &quot;people who don't play 4E to play 5E&quot;? And it's also about retaining people who play 4E. Can your propositions guarantee that? And I've advocated that NPCs as props should remain as the base, but that they could expanded as characters. Maybe I'm not the only one who could be accused of &quot;not reading what I've written very well.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Aldarc, post: 5773801, member: 5142"] First. Would you mind stop treating people, including myself, so condescendingly? Thanks. I'd really appreciate it. Now let's move on to your other points. From which you can't presume to know. It's not a truth. But then again, neither is "NPCs should be consistent with PCs." And it's utterly bizarre that you would expect me to explain this as "a truth" when it's not framed as such in the first place. And this is where I see the lip-service, because it presumes "Concessions in 5E should be about me!" You are expecting repeatedly that the game bends to [i]your[/i] expectations. I suppose it's only natural, but you have made a number of comments here and elsewhere about "deal breaker" things in 5E. It's not about what works best or what's best for the whole, but about those who do not play 4E, but these are the same people who played 1-2E which operated just as it did in 4E. So why is this framed in terms of "people who don't play 4E to play 5E"? And it's also about retaining people who play 4E. Can your propositions guarantee that? And I've advocated that NPCs as props should remain as the base, but that they could expanded as characters. Maybe I'm not the only one who could be accused of "not reading what I've written very well." [/QUOTE]

Verification