Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sammael's 3.75: Skills
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sylrae" data-source="post: 5012654" data-attributes="member: 48520"><p>This means nobody can ever have more than 3/4 BAB (except maybe at level 1), but assuming youre redesigning ALL the classes to compensate, that could be cool. I'd probably give less skill points, more often, and let them take skills every level. But some of this sounds quite reasonable. As I mentioned before, it resembles the well designed White-Wolf, with the exception of a few things I could see as problems.</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">That Seems cool.</li> </ul><p>That sounds cool, but you shouldnt base HP on class either then, realistically. I'm all for classes being entirely made of unique abilities. The idea sounds quite cool. Of course, this will likely have little to no compatibility with any other sourcebooks (just a preliminary opinion), but as long as you dont plan on using any monsters, and just stick to races with no LA or HD and just Class levels it should be ok.</p><p></p><p>That sounds cool. The only thing I saw in there is that the swashbuckler will probably have a <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> AC due to no class-based AC bonus. The swashbuckler makes more sense as a sort of monk, assuming you use a non-magical monk and then switch the weapon list.</p><p></p><p>If I could see a full set of these rules, theyre starting to sound much better than I initially thought, and sound quite cool in a unique playability kind of way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sylrae, post: 5012654, member: 48520"] This means nobody can ever have more than 3/4 BAB (except maybe at level 1), but assuming youre redesigning ALL the classes to compensate, that could be cool. I'd probably give less skill points, more often, and let them take skills every level. But some of this sounds quite reasonable. As I mentioned before, it resembles the well designed White-Wolf, with the exception of a few things I could see as problems. [LIST]That Seems cool. [/LIST] That sounds cool, but you shouldnt base HP on class either then, realistically. I'm all for classes being entirely made of unique abilities. The idea sounds quite cool. Of course, this will likely have little to no compatibility with any other sourcebooks (just a preliminary opinion), but as long as you dont plan on using any monsters, and just stick to races with no LA or HD and just Class levels it should be ok. That sounds cool. The only thing I saw in there is that the swashbuckler will probably have a :):):):):):) AC due to no class-based AC bonus. The swashbuckler makes more sense as a sort of monk, assuming you use a non-magical monk and then switch the weapon list. If I could see a full set of these rules, theyre starting to sound much better than I initially thought, and sound quite cool in a unique playability kind of way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sammael's 3.75: Skills
Top
