Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sitara" data-source="post: 4260213" data-attributes="member: 58107">Not sure why this is so hard to understand but I will try to explain. What I want is someone who can fight with a big sword and cast spells also. Not sure what you mean by 'full powered'. If you are referring to game balance,&nbsp; With 4e, it is totally viable without any game balance issues.For example;Say a single class fighter and a single class mage each get 5 martial powers A warrior mage would get 2 of the fighter powers, 2 of the wizard powers and maybe 1 unique power for his own class. Not sure where the problem is. The WM cannot outdamage a fighter or out blast a (they will be roughly equal), but the fighter will have greater flexibility in martial powers, the wizard will have greater flexibility in spells while the WM will have greater flexibiliy in terms of power types. They will all do comparable damage. I do not think thats an unfair request, and it will satisfy all WM fans out there without any 'game balance'issues.Also, anyone claiming 2e multiclassing was 'teh BROKEN111!!!111' has obviously not played the game and has no idea what he/she is talking about. A fighter/mage in 2e was great, yet at the same time never oversahdowed the party fighter or wizard. (at least not in their respective arena's. At higher levels any wizard could outshadow any martial class)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sitara, post: 4260213, member: 58107"] Not sure why this is so hard to understand but I will try to explain. What I want is someone who can fight with a big sword and cast spells also. Not sure what you mean by 'full powered'. If you are referring to game balance, With 4e, it is totally viable without any game balance issues. For example; Say a single class fighter and a single class mage each get 5 martial powers A warrior mage would get 2 of the fighter powers, 2 of the wizard powers and maybe 1 unique power for his own class. Not sure where the problem is. The WM cannot outdamage a fighter or out blast a (they will be roughly equal), but the fighter will have greater flexibility in martial powers, the wizard will have greater flexibility in spells while the WM will have greater flexibiliy in terms of power types. They will all do comparable damage. I do not think thats an unfair request, and it will satisfy all WM fans out there without any 'game balance'issues. Also, anyone claiming 2e multiclassing was 'teh BROKEN111!!!111' has obviously not played the game and has no idea what he/she is talking about. A fighter/mage in 2e was great, yet at the same time never oversahdowed the party fighter or wizard. (at least not in their respective arena's. At higher levels any wizard could outshadow any martial class) [/QUOTE]

Verification